The representation matrix for alpha and beta in Dirac equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of the matrices ##\alpha_i## and ##\beta## in the Dirac equation, specifically focusing on their forms and properties. It is established that from the anti-commutation relation, the matrices ##A_i## and ##D_i## must equal zero, leading to the conclusion that ##C_i## is the inverse of ##B_i## and also Hermitian. However, the proof that ##C_i## equals ##B_i## remains elusive, with the anti-commutation relation for different indices not providing clarity. The conversation also touches on the symmetry of ##\alpha_i## and ##\beta##, questioning whether they must always be symmetric and exploring their properties further. The discussion concludes with an attempt to generalize findings to a four-dimensional case, linking the matrices to polar coordinates.
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
Homework Statement
Prove that in the presentation of ##\beta##,

##\mathbf \alpha=\begin{pmatrix}\mathbf 0 & \mathbf \sigma \\ \mathbf \sigma & \mathbf 0\end{pmatrix} ## and ## \beta=\begin{pmatrix}\mathbf I & \mathbf 0 \\ \mathbf0 & -\mathbf I\end{pmatrix} ,##

where ##\mathbf \alpha## and ##\beta## are in the Dirac equation, in which ##H=c \mathbf \alpha \cdot \mathbf p +\beta m c^2##.
Relevant Equations
1. ##\mathbf \alpha## and ##\beta## are Hermitian.
2. ##\{ \mathbf \alpha_i, \mathbf \alpha_j \}=0##, if ##i\ne j##.
3. ##\{ \mathbf \alpha_i, \beta\}=0##.
4. ##\alpha_i^2=\beta^2=1##.
5. The traces of ##\mathbf \alpha## and ##\beta## are zero.
6. The eigenvalues of them are ##1## or ##-1##.
In the 4-dimensional representation of ##\beta##, ## \beta=\begin{pmatrix}\mathbf I & \mathbf 0 \\ \mathbf0 & -\mathbf I\end{pmatrix} ,## and we can suppose ## \alpha_i=\begin{pmatrix}\mathbf A_i & \mathbf B_i \\ \mathbf C_i & \mathbf D_i\end{pmatrix} ##.

From the anti-commutation relation ##\{ \mathbf \alpha_i, \beta\}=0##, I can derive ##A_i=D_i=0##.

From ##\alpha_i^2=1##, I can have ##C_i=B_i^{-1}##. Furthermore, from the Hermiticity, I can have ##C_i=B_i^{\dagger}##.

But I could not find a way to prove that ##C_i=B_i##. The relation ##\{ \mathbf \alpha_i, \mathbf \alpha_j \}=0## for ##i\ne j## does not help.

Should ##\alpha_i## and ##\beta## always be symmetric? This is not given in the problem. Is there any other properties of ##\alpha_i##?

I have looked in some books. These matrices are just given directly without proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say
<br /> B=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> a &amp; b \\<br /> c &amp; -a \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
with trace=0 used.
<br /> C=B^{-1}=\frac{-1}{det \ B}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> a &amp; b \\<br /> c &amp; -a \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> =\frac{-1}{det \ B} B
det \ B=-a^2-bc=-1
because B has eigenvalue 1 and -1 so
(a-\lambda)(-a-\lambda)-bc=0
for ##\lambda=\pm1##. As ##\alpha## is Hermitian we observe a is real and ## c=b^*##. so
a^2+|b|^2=1
 
Last edited:
@anuttarasammyak Thanks! I forgot the determinant. I will try to generalize it to 4 dimensional case.
 
Further to post #2 as general expression
<br /> B=C=<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> cos\theta &amp; sin\theta e^{-i\phi} \\<br /> sin\theta e^{i\phi} &amp; -cos\theta \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br /> =\cos\theta\ \sigma_z+sin\theta cos\phi\ \sigma_x+sin\theta sin\phi\ \sigma_y
that seems like unit vector in polar coordinates.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top