The set of all points for which two spheres intersect orthogonally

In summary: I'm not sure what it is supposed to represent.In summary, the set of points (a,b,c) for which the spheres x^2+y^2+z^2=1 and (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=1 intersect orthogonally is a sphere of radius 2 centered at the origin.
  • #1
twotwelve
9
0
[tex]Apostol 281, 4.[/tex]



Homework Statement


Find the set of points [tex](a,b,c)[/tex] for which the spheres below intersect orthogonally.
sphere 1: [tex]f(x,y,x):x^2+y^2+z^2=1[/tex]
sphere 2: [tex]g(x,y,z):(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=1[/tex]




The Attempt at a Solution


II know that the gradient vector, [tex]\nabla f[/tex], is normal to the surface determined by [tex]f[/tex], I'm just unclear on creating the connection to the either the gradient or surface of [tex]g[/tex]. Clarification would be great.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
twotwelve said:
[tex]Apostol 281, 4.[/tex]



Homework Statement


Find the set of points [tex](a,b,c)[/tex] for which the spheres below intersect orthogonally.
sphere 1: [tex]f(x,y,x):x^2+y^2+z^2=1[/tex]
sphere 2: [tex]g(x,y,z):(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=1[/tex]




The Attempt at a Solution


II know that the gradient vector, [tex]\nabla f[/tex], is normal to the surface determined by [tex]f[/tex], I'm just unclear on creating the connection to the either the gradient or surface of [tex]g[/tex]. Clarification would be great.

Thanks

What you want are all the intersection points at which the gradient for the sphere whose center is at the origin is orthogonal to the gradient of the sphere whose center is at (a, b, c).
 
  • #3
Does this suggest that I should examine the intersection [tex]f-g[/tex]?

Or should I find [tex]\nabla f \cdot \nabla g[/tex]?

I am genuinely unclear...
 
  • #4
twotwelve said:
Does this suggest that I should examine the intersection [tex]f-g[/tex]?
No.
twotwelve said:
Or should I find [tex]\nabla f \cdot \nabla g[/tex]?
Yes, but first things first. Find the points of intersection of the two spheres. Unless I am mistaken, there are three cases: the spheres intersect at every point on each; they intersect in a circle; they intersect at a single point (a degenerate circle of radius 0).

After you find the intersection points, then check that the gradients are othogonal. That would be how I would go about it.
twotwelve said:
I am genuinely unclear...
 
  • #5
Hmm, after deliberating over this problem for a good bit of time, the most that I can figure is any sphere having radius 1 and intersecting with [tex]f[/tex] must have a center within the outer sphere [tex]h:x^2+y^2+z^2=9[/tex].

I know that the gradient vectors of [tex]f[/tex] are all orthogonal to [tex]f(x,y,z)=1[/tex]. I also know that the gradient vectors of [tex]g[/tex] are orthogonal to [tex]g(x,y,z)=1[/tex]. I believe that at any point that these spheres are orthogonal to each other, than the gradient vectors at that point will also be orthogonal.

I understand that I need to first account for this intersection...yet I don't understand how.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
twotwelve said:
Hmm, after deliberating over this problem for a good bit of time, the most that I can figure is any sphere having radius 1 and intersecting with [tex]f[/tex] must have a center within the outer sphere [tex]h:x^2+y^2+z^2=9[/tex].
Well, that's nice, but I don't see how it's helpful. IMO, you should quit thinking about the functions f and g for awhile, and focus on the geometry of this situation, and find the intersection points. Then you can go to town with gradients and such.
twotwelve said:
I know that the gradient vectors of [tex]f[/tex] are all orthogonal to [tex]f(x,y,z)=1[/tex]. I also know that the gradient vectors of [tex]g[/tex] are orthogonal to [tex]g(x,y,z)=1[/tex]. I believe that at any point that these spheres are orthogonal to each other, than the gradient vectors at that point will also be orthogonal.

I understand that I need to first account for this intersection...yet I don't understand how.
 
  • #7
Yes, I was heading in the wrong direction.

My solution:
Any points [tex](x_0,y_0,z_0)[/tex] meeting our conditions will also have orthogonal tangent planes at those points satisfying [tex](x_0,y_0,z_0) \cdot (a-x_0,b-y_0,c-z_0)=0[/tex]. However, they also satisfy both [tex]f[/tex] and [tex]g[/tex]. Solving for all three yields [tex]a^2+b^2+c^2=2[/tex], a sphere of radius 2 centered at the origin.

Thanks for the assistance.
 
  • #8
x2 + y2 + z2 = 2 would be a sphere centered at the origin, of radius sqrt(2), but your equation in a, b, and c is just a relationship between three parameters.
 

FAQ: The set of all points for which two spheres intersect orthogonally

What is the definition of "orthogonal intersection" in the context of two spheres?

In mathematics, two spheres are said to intersect orthogonally if they intersect at right angles, meaning their common tangent planes are perpendicular to each other.

How is the set of all points for which two spheres intersect orthogonally represented?

The set of all points for which two spheres intersect orthogonally is represented by the intersection of the two spheres, which forms a circle.

What are the conditions for two spheres to intersect orthogonally?

Two spheres intersect orthogonally when their centers are located on the same line and the distance between their centers is equal to the sum of their radii.

Can two spheres intersect orthogonally at more than one point?

No, two spheres can only intersect orthogonally at one point. This is because the distance between the centers of the spheres must be equal to the sum of their radii, meaning they can only touch at one point.

How is the concept of orthogonal intersection of two spheres applicable in real-world scenarios?

The concept of orthogonal intersection of two spheres has various applications in physics, engineering, and computer graphics. For example, it is used in calculating the trajectory of objects in motion, designing spherical structures, and creating 3D models. It also has practical applications in GPS technology and satellite communication systems.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
724
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top