- #1
Ezio3.1415
- 159
- 1
I may have a misconception about the way the potentiometer measures thermal emf... (Seebeck effect... Fe,Cu...the two points where these two wire are connected are at different Temperature... So there is a voltage difference between the two points...)
When we are to measure the E,we need to know the current that goes through the resistance of the potentiometer wire while the galvanometer has to show that there is no current going through the thermocouple... Now the I that is flowing through the circuit of the potentiometer is divided into two parts for say Ip and Ic when it comes to the point where the thermocouple is connected... And we connected the jockey in such a way with the circuit that the thermal current equals Ic... So in the other part of the circuit does only Ip flow? So to get this reading should I connect the ammitter in this part of the circuit(The part where current enters the battery)? Will I get a different reading if I put the ammitter in the first part of the circuit(part where current is coming out of the battery)...
When we are to measure the E,we need to know the current that goes through the resistance of the potentiometer wire while the galvanometer has to show that there is no current going through the thermocouple... Now the I that is flowing through the circuit of the potentiometer is divided into two parts for say Ip and Ic when it comes to the point where the thermocouple is connected... And we connected the jockey in such a way with the circuit that the thermal current equals Ic... So in the other part of the circuit does only Ip flow? So to get this reading should I connect the ammitter in this part of the circuit(The part where current enters the battery)? Will I get a different reading if I put the ammitter in the first part of the circuit(part where current is coming out of the battery)...