Thermodynamic Identities Proof - Gibbs and Helmholtz

In summary, the Helmholtz and Gibbs free energy definitions, along with the thermodynamic identity, can be used to show that entropy can be expressed as -(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T})_V and -(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T})_P. Furthermore, using these definitions and the derived expressions, the Gibbs-Helmholtz equations U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T} \right)_V and H = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (G/T)}{\partial T} \right)_P can be obtained. These equations are useful in chemical thermodynamics.
  • #1
TFM
1,026
0

Homework Statement



Use the definitions of Helmholtz free energy, F, and Gibbs free energy, H, together with the thermodynamic identity, to show that

[tex] S = -(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T})_V [/tex] and [tex] S = -(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T})_P [/tex]

Then use those definitions again, and the expressions above, to show that

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex] and [tex] H = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (G/T)}{\partial T} \right)_P [/tex]

These equations are known as the Gibbs-Helmholtz equations and are useful in chemical thermodynamics.

Homework Equations



Helmholtz:

[tex] F = U - TS [/tex]

Gibbs:

[tex] G = H - TS = U - TS + PV [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have succesfully done the first part (showing S = F/T...) But I am stuck on the second.

I asked the ;ectuirer, whop said I should first work backwards, and do df/DT, and insert into the equation. This has given me?

[tex] F(T) = V - TS [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\partial F}{\partial T} = -S [/tex]

insert:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{-S}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex]

now the thermodynamic identity is:

dU = Tds - pdv

I do I get rid of the squared part?

because if I just differentiate T squared, I get 2T,

so this could leave me with:

[tex] U = -2T \left(-S} \right)_V [/tex]

but this doesn't make the S a ds? and I have a factor of 2?

Any ideas?

Many thanks,

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would use the chain rule to evaluate

[tex]\left(\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T}\right)_V[/tex]

which will give you two terms. Then plug in [itex]F=U-TS[/itex], which leads to the desired first expression. The same approach works for the H-G pair.
 
  • #3
Okay, so using chain rule:

[tex] \frac{\partial \frac{F(T)}{T}}{dT} [/tex]

Would the quotient rule not be best:

[tex] u = F(T), v = T, du/DT = F'(t), dv/dT = 1 [/tex]

giving:

[tex] \frac{TF'(T) - 1F(T)}{T^2} [/tex]

Plug in F = U - TS, F' = -S


[tex] \frac{T(-S) - U - TS}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{-TS - U - TS}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{-2TS - U}{T^2} [/tex]

Reinsert:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{-2TS - U}{T^2} \right)_V [/tex]

This cancels to:


[tex] U = -2TS - U [/tex]

[tex] 2U = -2TS [/tex]

[tex] U = -TS [/tex]

I don't think this is right...?
 
  • #4
TFM said:
Okay, so using chain rule:

[tex] \frac{\partial \frac{F(T)}{T}}{dT} [/tex]

Would the quotient rule not be best:

[tex] u = F(T), v = T, du/DT = F'(t), dv/dT = 1 [/tex]

giving:

[tex] \frac{TF'(T) - 1F(T)}{T^2} [/tex]

Plug in F = U - TS, F' = -S


[tex] \frac{T(-S) - U - TS}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{-TS - U - TS}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{-2TS - U}{T^2} [/tex]

Reinsert:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{-2TS - U}{T^2} \right)_V [/tex]

This cancels to:


[tex] U = -2TS - U [/tex]

[tex] 2U = -2TS [/tex]

[tex] U = -TS [/tex]

I don't think this is right...?

Try this approach,

First divide F by T. Then differentiate the answer. Then plug in the thermodynamic identity for dU. Rearrange, and let N and V be constant. This should give you the right answer.
 
  • #5
So when you say divide F by T, would thuis be F/T, or do we use F = U - TS, giving U/T - S?
 
  • #6
TFM said:
So when you say divide F by T, would thuis be F/T, or do we use F = U - TS, giving U/T - S?

You want both of those.
 
  • #7
Okay, so

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex]

F/T = U/T - S

put into equation:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (\fracd{U}{T} - S)}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex]

differentiating this gives:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(U)_V [/tex]

?
 
  • #8
TFM said:
Okay, so

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex]

F/T = U/T - S

put into equation:

[tex] U = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (\fracd{U}{T} - S)}{\partial T} \right)_V [/tex]

What you want is this;

[tex]\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T}=\frac{\partial (\frac{U}{T} - S)}{\partial T}[/tex]

Then think what is d(U/T)/dT?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
You made an arithmetic error in post #3. You're almost there.
 
  • #10
That is strange we posted at exactly the same time. Are you my long lost twin brother? :wink:
 
  • #11
Vuldoraq said:
What you want is this;

[tex]\frac{\partial (F/T)}{\partial T}=\frac{\partial (\frac{U}{T} - S)}{\partial T}[/tex]

Then think what is d(U/T)/dT?

Would it be U/T^2 ?
 
  • #12
TFM said:
Would it be U/T^2 ?

That wold be part of it, although I think it should be negative U/T^2. Use the quotient rule and remember that you can't actually differentiate U so you have to leave it as dU/dT.
 
  • #13
Okay, so using the quotient rule:

U = U (:rolleyes:)
V = T

du/dt = du/dt

dvdt = 1

thus:

[tex] = \frac{U - Tdu/dT}{T^2} [/tex]

Look okay now?
 
  • #14
TFM said:
Okay, so using the quotient rule:

U = U (:rolleyes:)
V = T

du/dt = du/dt

dvdt = 1

thus:

[tex] = \frac{U - Tdu/dT}{T^2} [/tex]

Look okay now?

YOur quotient rule is back to front I believe. It should be (the following are for the general case);

[tex](\frac{u}{v})'=\frac{u'*v-u*v'}{v^{2}}[/tex] Note where the primes are, differentiate top times bottom, then take away the derivative of the bottom times the top and divide the whole lot by the bottom squared.

Once you've changed that let dU=identity and the rest is just rearranging.

Edit: I don't mean dU=1, I just mean the thermodynamic identity for dU, which you must have used earlier.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Okay, so it should have been:

[tex] \frac{dU/dT T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

so now the thermodynamic identity:

dU = Tds - pdv

so now I have to rearrange

[tex] \frac{dU/dT T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

into dU = , then replace du with the thermo identity, and solve?
 
  • #16
TFM said:
Okay, so it should have been:

[tex] \frac{dU/dT T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

so now the thermodynamic identity:

dU = Tds - pdv

so now I have to rearrange

[tex] \frac{dU/dT T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

into dU = , then replace du with the thermo identity, and solve?

It would be easier if you just substituted for dU in the differential equation and solved. Don't forget the -dS/dT term from earlier when you put everything back together.
 
  • #17
so,

dU = Tds + pdV

sub into:

[tex] \frac{dU/dT T - U}{T^2} [/tex]


[tex] \frac{(Tds + pdV/dT) T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

this will give:

[tex] \frac{T^2 ds/dT + pT dV/dT - U}{T^2} [/tex]

?
 
  • #18
Thats right. Now all you have to do is simplify and you will have the right answer.
 
  • #19
Okay so:

[tex] \frac{T^2 ds/dT + pT dV/dT - U}{T^2} [/tex]

break it down into:

[tex] \frac{T^2 ds/dT}{T^2} + \frac{PT dV/dT}{T^2} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{ds}{dT} + \frac{P dV/dT}{T} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{ds}{dT} + \frac{P dV/dT}{T} = \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

Okay so far?
 
  • #20
TFM said:
Okay so:

[tex] \frac{T^2 ds/dT + pT dV/dT - U}{T^2} [/tex]

break it down into:

[tex] \frac{T^2 ds/dT}{T^2} + \frac{PT dV/dT}{T^2} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{ds}{dT} + \frac{P dV/dT}{T} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{ds}{dT} + \frac{P dV/dT}{T} = \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

Okay so far?

Not sure about the equals sign here, don't forget this is part of the rhs of the equation,

d(F/T)/dT=d/dT(U/T-S)
 
  • #21
Okay, so:

[tex] \frac{d(F/T)}{dT} = \frac{ds}{dT} + \frac{P dV/dT}{T} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

It doesn't look very similar yet though?
 
  • #22
the ds/dt Will cancel, because we had a -ds/dt earlier on, from the F/T, so:

[tex] \frac{d(F/T)}{dT} = \frac{P dV/dT}{T} - \frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
  • #23
That is exactly right, it's what you want. Now if you fix V constant what happens to dv/dt?
 
  • #24
well, the dv will cancel if V is constant, thus:

[tex] \frac{d(F/T)}{dT} = -\frac{u}{T^2} [/tex]

this rearranges to give:

[tex] u = -T^2 \frac{d(F/T)}{dT} [/tex]

Which is what we was meant to find!

Thats good, so now for the second one,

[tex] H = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (G/T)}{\partial T} \right)_P [/tex]

I assume I need to start of by doing G/T:

G = H - TS

thus:

[tex] G/T = H/T - S [/tex]

[tex] H = -T^2 \left(\frac{\partial (H/T - S)}{\partial T} \right)_P [/tex]

now this will give:

[tex] \frac{partial H/T}{\partial T} - \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} [/tex]

I assume I need to use quotient rule again,

u = H, du/dT = dH/dT

v = T, dv/dT = 1

giving:

[tex] \frac{\frac{dH}{dT}T - H}{T^2} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{\frac{dH}{dT}T - H}{T^2} - \frac{\partial S}{\partial T}[/tex]

do I now substitute in dH?
 
  • #25
Yes, I think if you put dH in it should come out in a similar manner to the previous one
 
  • #26
okay, so:

dH = dU + pdv

[tex] \frac{\frac{dH}{dT}T - H}{T^2} - \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} = \frac{\frac{dH}{dT}}{T} - \frac{H}{T^2}[/tex]

[tex] \frac{dU + pdv}{dT}}{T} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{dU}{dT}T + pT\frac{dv}{dT} [/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
  • #27
I think you now have to expand dU.
 
  • #28
okay, so:

[tex] \frac{dU}{dT}T + pT\frac{dv}{dT} [/tex]


dU = Tds + pdV

[tex] \frac{Tds + pdV}{dT}T + pT\frac{dv}{dT} [/tex]


[tex] {T^2\frac{ds}{dT} + pT\frac{dV}{dT} + pT\frac{dv}{dT} [/tex]

[tex] {T^2\frac{ds}{dT} + 2pT\frac{dV}{dT} [/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
  • #29
I think something has gone wrong here.

Try starting over except this time use G=U+PV-TS. Do the exact same to this as you did for F=U-TS.
 
  • #30
okay,

G=U+PV-TS

G/T = U/T + PV/T - S

[tex] H = -T^2 \frac{\partial (U/T +PV/T - S)}{\partial T} [/tex]

quotient rule (1):

u = U, du/dT = dU/dT

v = T, dv/dT = 1

[tex] = \frac{\frac{dU}{dT}T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

quotient rule (2):

u = PV, du/dT = d(PV)/dT

v = T, dv/dT = 1

[tex] = \frac{\frac{d(PV)}{dT}T - U}{T^2} [/tex]

thus:

[tex] H = -T^2(\frac{\frac{dU}{dT}T - U}{T^2} + \frac{\frac{d(PV)}{dT}T - U}{T^2} - \frac{\partial S)}{\partial T}) [/tex]

okay so far?
 
  • #31
TFM said:
okay,

G=U+PV-TS

G/T = U/T + PV/T - S

[tex] H = -T^2 \frac{\partial (U/T +PV/T - S)}{\partial T} [/tex]

Okay let's go from here;

[tex]G/T=U/T+PV/T-S[/tex]

[tex]d(G/T)/dT=\frac{\frac{dU}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT})}{T^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT}[/tex]

Now let dU equal it's identity again let P be constant, simplify and rearrange. Should get you to the answer. All my d's should be partial d's.
 
  • #32
So:

[tex] d(G/T}/dT=\frac{\frac{dU}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT}}{T ^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT} [/tex]

dU = Tds + pdv

[tex] d(G/T}/dT=\frac{\frac{Tds + pdv}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT}}{T ^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT} [/tex]

so:


[tex] d(G/T}/dT=\frac{T\frac{ds}{dT} + p\frac{dv}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+\frac{TV\frac{dP}{dT} + TP\frac{dV}{dT}}{T^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT} [/tex]

Pressure is constant, so can get rid of dP

[tex] d(G/T}/dT=\frac{T\frac{ds}{dT} + p\frac{dv}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+ TP\frac{dV}{dT}}{T^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT} [/tex]

Does this look okay?

[tex] d(G/T}/dT= T\frac{ds}{dT} + p\frac{dv}{dT}T-\frac{U}{T^{2}}+T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT}}-\frac{dS}{dT} [/tex]
 
  • #33
Vuldoraq said:
Okay let's go from here;

[tex]G/T=U/T+PV/T-S[/tex]

[tex]d(G/T)/dT=\frac{\frac{dU}{dT}T-U}{T^{2}}+\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT})}{T^{2}}-\frac{dS}{dT}[/tex]

Now let dU equal it's identity again let P be constant, simplify and rearrange. Should get you to the answer. All my d's should be partial d's.

Sorry I made an error,

This,

[tex]\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT})}{T^{2}}[/tex]

Should be this,

[tex]\frac{T(V\frac{dP}{dT}+P\frac{dV}{dT})-PV}{T^{2}}[/tex]
 

FAQ: Thermodynamic Identities Proof - Gibbs and Helmholtz

What is the basic concept of thermodynamic identities?

The concept of thermodynamic identities is based on the laws of thermodynamics, which describe the relationships between different thermodynamic properties such as energy, temperature, and entropy. These identities are mathematical equations that relate changes in these properties to each other under different conditions.

What is the Gibbs identity and how is it derived?

The Gibbs identity is a thermodynamic identity that relates changes in enthalpy, entropy, and temperature. It is derived from the first and second laws of thermodynamics, which state that energy cannot be created or destroyed, and that the total entropy of a closed system will always increase or remain constant.

What is the Helmholtz identity and how is it related to the Gibbs identity?

The Helmholtz identity is another thermodynamic identity that relates changes in internal energy, entropy, and temperature. It is derived from the first and second laws of thermodynamics, similar to the Gibbs identity. The two identities are related through a mathematical transformation, and can be used interchangeably in certain situations.

What are some applications of thermodynamic identities in science and engineering?

Thermodynamic identities are used in a variety of fields, including chemistry, physics, and engineering. They are essential in understanding and predicting the behavior of systems, such as chemical reactions, phase transitions, and thermodynamic processes. They are also used in the design and optimization of energy systems, such as power plants and refrigeration systems.

What are some common misconceptions about thermodynamic identities?

One common misconception is that thermodynamic identities can only be used in ideal systems or under certain conditions. In reality, they can be applied to a wide range of systems, including real-world systems with non-ideal behavior. Another misconception is that these identities are only relevant in thermodynamics, when in fact they have applications in many other fields, such as statistical mechanics and information theory.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
532
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
477
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
152
Back
Top