- #1
tade
- 721
- 26
I was thinking about an idea of a calendar epoch based on the field of physics, and its thinking about which event should be used as the epoch
so I have this idea and just wondering what you guys might think about it
I initially landed upon two ideas, one pretty ancient and the other kinda modern. The ancient idea is about the first application of maths to physics in history, which was probably the Law of the Lever, the formula of torque:
Though its so ancient and simple that we probably won't ever know when it was first discovered
And so its now on to the kinda modern one, and I should probably declare that I’m not a Kiwi lol, and thus I’m not biased in that manner. Well I was inspired by a quote from Richard Feynman:
And yeah, the atom is a fundamental building block of nature. Of course not the most fundamental, though its quite an important piece of the puzzle
And the heart of the atom is the nucleus. And so the idea is the action of artificially affecting the nucleus
Looking at history, it seems that the first recorded instance was Rutherford beaming alpha particles through various gases in 1917, resulting in the nuclear fusion of a nitrogen nucleus with an alpha particle to form fluorine
Or more clearly, the effect observed was the emission of protons from the fission of the resultant fluorine atoms, and Rutherford was able to determine that nitrogen was the primary reactant, that he wasn’t just propelling existing hydrogen atoms; a clearer picture of the nuclear reaction, and discovering the fluorine and oxygen products, was later determined by Patrick Blackett when he was following from Rutherford’s results
And Rutherford also said that what he considered this suggestion of the artificial disintegration of the nucleus of an atom was “of greater significance” and/or “of far greater importance” than World War I, when he had forgotten to attend an important meeting of a war research committee
Rutherford was no doubt a real atomic experimental powerhouse, discovering the widely conceived model of the atom and the atomic nucleus with the observed backscattering of alpha particles together with Geiger and Marsden and winning the 1908 Nobel Prize in chemistry "for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements, and the chemistry of radioactive substances"
So yeah do let me know what you think, would like to hear your feedback and opinions, thanks
so I have this idea and just wondering what you guys might think about it
I initially landed upon two ideas, one pretty ancient and the other kinda modern. The ancient idea is about the first application of maths to physics in history, which was probably the Law of the Lever, the formula of torque:
Though its so ancient and simple that we probably won't ever know when it was first discovered
And so its now on to the kinda modern one, and I should probably declare that I’m not a Kiwi lol, and thus I’m not biased in that manner. Well I was inspired by a quote from Richard Feynman:
If, in some cataclysm, all of scientific knowledge were to be destroyed, and only one sentence passed on to the next generations of creatures, what statement would contain the most information in the fewest words? I believe it is the atomic hypothesis (or the atomic fact, or whatever you wish to call it) that all things are made of atoms—little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence, you will see, there is an enormous amount of information about the world, if just a little imagination and thinking are applied.
And yeah, the atom is a fundamental building block of nature. Of course not the most fundamental, though its quite an important piece of the puzzle
And the heart of the atom is the nucleus. And so the idea is the action of artificially affecting the nucleus
Looking at history, it seems that the first recorded instance was Rutherford beaming alpha particles through various gases in 1917, resulting in the nuclear fusion of a nitrogen nucleus with an alpha particle to form fluorine
Or more clearly, the effect observed was the emission of protons from the fission of the resultant fluorine atoms, and Rutherford was able to determine that nitrogen was the primary reactant, that he wasn’t just propelling existing hydrogen atoms; a clearer picture of the nuclear reaction, and discovering the fluorine and oxygen products, was later determined by Patrick Blackett when he was following from Rutherford’s results
And Rutherford also said that what he considered this suggestion of the artificial disintegration of the nucleus of an atom was “of greater significance” and/or “of far greater importance” than World War I, when he had forgotten to attend an important meeting of a war research committee
Rutherford was no doubt a real atomic experimental powerhouse, discovering the widely conceived model of the atom and the atomic nucleus with the observed backscattering of alpha particles together with Geiger and Marsden and winning the 1908 Nobel Prize in chemistry "for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements, and the chemistry of radioactive substances"
So yeah do let me know what you think, would like to hear your feedback and opinions, thanks
Last edited: