Third Option For Dealing With Iran

  • News
  • Thread starter WarrenPlatts
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a potential strategy for dealing with Iran by conducting a quick and decisive invasion and then immediately leaving the country without occupying it. This approach is seen as a way to minimize casualties and avoid a prolonged occupation, while also potentially causing the downfall of the Iranian regime. Some participants in the conversation express skepticism and criticize the potential consequences of such a plan.
  • #36
This thread is done. For those who couldn't post without including insults, I'm not wasting my time editing for content.
 

Similar threads

News What are the potential consequences of occupying Iran?
6
Replies
193
Views
21K
News Is the US Prepared to Militarily Engage Iran?
4
Replies
127
Views
16K
News Iran moving to outlaw dog ownership
Replies
28
Views
5K
News Biden: New Israel would be 'ill-advised' to attack Iran
4
Replies
132
Views
13K
News Iran declares victory over the USA
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
News Why Does Russia Support a Nuclear-Armed Iran?
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
News Examining the Motivations Behind the U.S. Detaining Iranians in Iraq
Replies
19
Views
3K
News Is the US Preparing for War with Iran?
2
Replies
58
Views
9K
News Is Iran Developing Nuclear Weapons and What Actions Will the US Take?
Replies
10
Views
4K
News Should the US intervene in world problems?
Replies
29
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top