MHB This gives us the length of each train as 500 meters.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Trains
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the length of two trains traveling on parallel tracks, one at 40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It is established that it takes two minutes longer for the trains to pass each other when moving in the same direction compared to when they are moving in opposite directions. By converting speeds to meters per minute and setting up equations based on the time taken to pass, the length of each train is calculated. The final conclusion reached is that each train measures 500 meters in length. This algebraic approach effectively demonstrates the relationship between speed, time, and distance in this scenario.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Two trains of equal length are on parallel tracks. One train is traveling at
40 km/h and the other at 20 km/h. It takes two minutes longer for the trains to
completely pass one another when going in the same direction, than when going
in opposite directions.
Determine the length of each train.

Is there a way to algebraically solve this
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would convert the speeds to m/min...

$$v\,\frac{\text{km}}{\text{hr}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ hr}}{60\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{1000\text{ m}}{1\text{ km}}=\frac{50}{3}v\,\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

And so the speed of the faster train (in m/min) is:

$$v_F=\frac{2000}{3}$$

And the speed of the slower train is:

$$v_S=\frac{1000}{3}$$

In fact, we could write:

$$v_F=2v_S$$

Let's let the length of the trains be $\ell$.

Now, when the trains pass going in the same direction, we have:

$$(v_F-v_S)(t+2)=2\ell$$

or:

$$v_S(t+2)=2\ell$$

And when the trains pass going in the opposite direction, we have:

$$(v_F+v_S)t=2\ell$$

or:

$$3v_St=2\ell$$

Can you proceed?
 
t=1 so l=500m?
 
Last edited:
We have

$$3v_St=2L\quad(1)$$

and

$$v_S(t+2)=2L\quad(2)$$

Multiply $(2)$ by 3 and then subtract $(1)$ from the result:

$$3v_S(t+2)=6L\Rightarrow3v_St+6v_S=6L$$

$$6v_S=4L\Rightarrow v_S=\frac{2L}{3}\Rightarrow\frac{1000}{3}=\frac{2L}{3}\implies L=500\text{ m.}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top