Time to Reach 12m: Solving the Physics Behind It

In summary: I GUESS that the book problem statement is actually "after how long will it be at a height of 13.27 meters after being launched upward at 5 m/s from the ground." That would be a very different problem from the one you posed here. It would also be a problem for which the book answer is correct. :DIn summary, the book's answer of t = sqrt((2d)/g) does not seem to match the given problem statement. It is possible that there is an error in either the problem or our interpretation of it. However, if the problem was meant to ask for the time it takes for an object launched upward at 5 m/s to reach a height of 13.27 meters
  • #1
leprofece
241
0
A heel kick vertically upwards from the floor and a student in a window see it go up in front of it to 5.00 m/s. The window is 12.0 m above the floor. no taking into account the air resistance . How long it takes to reach that point?

The distance to reach is 1.27 m plus 12m

I Only want to know the answer the book used
t = sqrt ( ( 2.13,27)/9.8 )
But why not to use
y = 13.27+ 5t -5t2?

This is why i ask this question
can anybody help me??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I moved this thread as it is algebra based physics, but I am not sure how to give it a more descriptive title because I don't know what is being asked and the given answer from your textbook does not make sense to me.

t = sqrt ( ( 2.13,27)/9.8 )

What does that mean?

A diagram would be very helpful here to better convey what is being asked. :D
 
  • #3
leprofece said:
A heel kick vertically upwards from the floor and a student in a window see it go up in front of it to 5.00 m/s. The window is 12.0 m above the floor. no taking into account the air resistance . How long it takes to reach that point?

The distance to reach is 1.27 m plus 12m

I Only want to know the answer the book used
t = sqrt ( ( 2.13,27)/9.8 )
But why not to use
y = 13.27+ 5t -5t2?

This is why i ask this question
can anybody help me??

It is imposible to follow the English of your question exactly, but it is possible to comment on what you ask at the end.

1. First the question is using a value of \(\displaystyle 9.8\) for g not \(\displaystyle 10\).

2. Your expression \(\displaystyle y = 13.27+ 5t -5t^2\) is for displacement not time which is what the question asks for.

3. The answer the book uses: \(\displaystyle t=\sqrt{(2\times 13.27)/9.8}\), is the time to fall from rest to the ground, where it has speed \(\displaystyle -5.15\) m/s \(\displaystyle \approx -5\)m/s. So is approximately the time it takes a ball with kicked from the ground upwards with initial speed \(\displaystyle 5\) m/s to rise to \(\displaystyle 13.27\) m.

.
 
  • #4
zzephod said:
It is imposible to follow the English of your question exactly, but it is possible to comment on what you ask at the end.

1. First the question is using a value of \(\displaystyle 9.8\) for g not \(\displaystyle 10\).

2. Your expression \(\displaystyle y = 13.27+ 5t -5t^2\) is for displacement not time which is what the question asks for.

3. The answer the book uses: \(\displaystyle t=\sqrt{(2\times 13.27)/9.8}\), is the time to fall from rest to the ground, where it has speed \(\displaystyle -5.15\) m/s \(\displaystyle \approx -5\)m/s. So is approximately the time it takes a ball with kicked from the ground upwards with initial speed \(\displaystyle 5\) m/s to rise to \(\displaystyle 13.27\) m.

.

my expression 13.27+ 5t -5t2 = 0
I ask why I cannot calculate time from this expresion or solving this equation??
 
  • #5
leprofece said:
my expression 13.27+ 5t -5t2 = 0
I ask why I cannot calculate time from this expresion or solving this equation??

You can use this, it is the exact solution, except that acceleration is 9.8 meters per second not 10, but you have to solve the quadratic equation..
 
Last edited:
  • #6
DavidCampen said:
You can use this, it is the exact solution, except that acceleration is 9.8 meters per second not 10, but you have to solve the quadratic equation..

BUT THE BOOK Givis as a solution t = sqrt((2d)/g)
What is the right answer then ? and why??
I would appreciate your help!
Maybe Vo = 0 but i think at that time it is not in free fall
 
  • #7
Yes, the book's solution does not match ours. Perhaps there is an error in the problem statement or our interpretation. An object launched upward at a constant velocity of 5 m/s in the Earth's gravitational field will never attain a height of 13.27 meters. So perhaps we need to work backwards from the book's answer to find the error in the problem statement or our interpretation of it.
 
  • #8
As ZZephod said, the book's answer is the time it would take for an object to fall 13.27 meters in the Earth's gravitational field; about 1.65 seconds. At the constant upward velocity of 5 meters per second, and ignoring the effect of gravity, the object will rise only 8.25 meters in 1.65 seconds. So, after launching an object upward at 5 meters/second, it will have reversed course and struck the ground in less than 1.65 seconds while never reaching a height of 13.27 meters.

Trying to work backward from the book answer I just cannot find a reasonable problem statement that would give that answer.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Time to Reach 12m: Solving the Physics Behind It

What is "Time to Reach 12m" and why is it important?

"Time to Reach 12m" refers to the amount of time it takes for an object to fall from a height of 12 meters and reach the ground. This is an important concept in physics as it helps us understand the laws of motion and gravity.

How is "Time to Reach 12m" calculated?

The formula for calculating "Time to Reach 12m" is t = √(2h/g), where t is time, h is height, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²). This formula is derived from the laws of motion and can be used to calculate the time it takes for any object to fall a certain distance.

Is "Time to Reach 12m" affected by the weight of the object?

Yes, the weight of an object does affect its "Time to Reach 12m". Objects with a greater mass will take longer to reach the ground than lighter objects. This is because the force of gravity is directly proportional to an object's mass, according to Newton's Second Law of Motion.

Does air resistance play a role in "Time to Reach 12m"?

Yes, air resistance can affect an object's "Time to Reach 12m". Air resistance is a force that opposes the motion of an object and can slow down its descent. This is why objects with a larger surface area, such as a feather, take longer to reach the ground than objects with a smaller surface area, such as a coin.

How does "Time to Reach 12m" differ on different planets?

"Time to Reach 12m" will differ on different planets due to variations in their gravitational pull. For example, on a planet with a stronger gravitational pull than Earth, the "Time to Reach 12m" will be shorter because the object will accelerate faster towards the ground. On a planet with a weaker gravitational pull, the "Time to Reach 12m" will be longer because the object will accelerate slower towards the ground.

Back
Top