I Tips on generating entangled photon pair with SPDC entanglement source

PokemanDude
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
My lab is trying to produce entangled photons with an SPDC entanglement source, but we're having trouble aligning the setup to produce entangled photons. What are some alignment tips for this equipment?
Hello! In my summer lab, me and my labmates are trying to generate entangled photon pairs using a spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) entanglement source with BBO crystals. We're using a 405 nm diode laser from Matchbox with model number 405L-21A. Our setup is as follows: we shine the laser through the SPDC entanglement source, and it is supposed to produce a pair of entangled photons (one is 847 nm and the other is 776 nm) and send them into one end of a fiber optic. The other end directs the entangled photons into a 50/50 beamsplitter. On one output side of the beamsplitter, we placed a filter that lets through 780 nm light and then a photon detector, and on the other output side, we placed a filter that lets through 850 nm light and then a photon detector. To detect entanglement, we are looking to see coincidences in the two detectors.
We're having trouble producing entangled photons, and we suspect that the laser, entanglement source, and fiber optic aren't aligned properly. What are some tips for aligning these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello PokemanDude,

Questions,

1. Do you see some lasers generated by the parametric process at signal wavelength and idle wavelength? If you do see some lasers, it means the alignment process should be OK.
2. If you do see some lasers generated by parametric process, can you test the wavelengths and what are the results? If one of them is longer than 810 nm and another one is shorter than 810 nm, it means you do see the signal and the idle wave, meaning your alignment should be very close to what is being expected.

Recommendation,

If you do see the signal and idle wavelength, the next step should be doing some fine alignment to increase the efficiency and adjust the wavelength.

Regards,

Xuedong He

,
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top