To prove that vectors (a + b)(a - b) = a^2 + b^2 iff

  • Thread starter Thread starter nishantve1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation (\vec{a} + \vec{b}) \cdot (\vec{a} - \vec{b}) = |\vec{a}|^2 + |\vec{b}|^2 if and only if \vec{a} is perpendicular to \vec{b}. Participants clarify that the correct relation should actually be (\vec{a} + \vec{b}) \cdot (\vec{a} - \vec{b}) = |\vec{a}|^2 - |\vec{b}|^2. There is confusion regarding the original question, with suggestions to verify the problem statement. The conversation emphasizes understanding vector operations and the definitions of the dot product. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial claim is incorrect and requires re-evaluation.
nishantve1
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The question says :
Prove that
(\vec{a} + \vec{b}).(\vec{a} - \vec{b}) = \left | \vec{a} \right |^{2} + \left | \vec{b} \right |^{2}
if and only if \vec{a} \perp \vec{b}

Homework Equations



This is known that
\left | \vec{a} + \vec{b} \right | = \left | \vec{a} - \vec{b} \right |
if \vec{a} \perp \vec{b}

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried substituting that and then using Cauchy–Schwarz inequality but somehow I can't open up the absolute brackets .
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can simply use the distributive property.

EDIT: Are you sure that you have copied down the question correctly? I guess the RHS should be \left | \vec{a} \right |^{2} - \left | \vec{b} \right |^{2}
 
Last edited:
@Pranav The question is correct
 
nishantve1 said:
@Pranav The question is correct

Substitute \vec{a}=\hat{i} and \vec{b}=\hat{j}. The relation doesn't satisfy this.
 
That doesn't sound right: take the following example:

\vec{a}=\left ( 1 , 0\right )
\vec{b}=\left ( 0 , -0.1\right )

\left ( \vec{a} + \vec{b} \right ) \cdot \left ( \vec{a} - \vec{b} \right ) = 0.99

but

\left| \vec{a} \right|^2 + \left| \vec{b} \right|^2 = 1.01

J.
 
As several people have told you now, the correct relation is
(\vec{a}+ \vec{b})\cdot(\vec{a}- \vec{b})= |\vec{a}|^2- |\vec{b}|^2
not what you wrote. You should have realized that from the usual numerical "difference of squares" formula.

As to how to prove it, what "tools" do have to? You write as if you had never seen vectors before but that can't be true if you are expected to do a probolem like this!
How are you working with vectors? In terms of components? Are you allowed to assume two or three dimensions? Or in terms of "length and direction"?

How has the dot product been defined? As "<a_1, a_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, a_n>\cdot<b_1, b_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, b_n>= a_1b_1+ a_2b_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nb_n? Or as |\vec{a}||\vec{b}|sin(\theta) where \theta is the angle between \vec{a}| and \vec{b}?

Either can be used but the proof depends on which you are using.
 
nishantve1 said:
Prove that
(\vec{a} + \vec{b}).(\vec{a} - \vec{b}) = \left | \vec{a} \right |^{2} + \left | \vec{b} \right |^{2}
if and only if \vec{a} \perp \vec{b}
This is obviously false. Double check the question. It is probably asking you to prove that (\vec a + \vec b) \cdot (\vec a + \vec b) = ||\vec a||^2 + ||\vec b||^2 iff \vec{a} \perp \vec{b}.
 
HallsofIvy said:
(\vec{a}+ \vec{b})\cdot(\vec{a}- \vec{b})= |\vec{a}|^2- |\vec{b}|^2
But this is true for all a,b.

My guess: Show that
(\vec{a}+ \vec{b})\cdot(\vec{a}+ \vec{b})= |\vec{a}|^2+ |\vec{b}|^2
is true if and only if ##\vec{a} \perp \vec{b}##.

Edit: Same minute :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K