Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region

In summary, the author has been working on a problem which requires the numerical evaluation of an improper integral. He has found a monograph which has three recommended substitutions for transforming the limits of integration. The first substitution replaces the variable \omega with -\alpha \mbox{log}(1-y), where alpha is a positive number. The second substitution replaces \omega with \frac{y}{1-y} and the third substitution replaces \omega with \left ( \frac{y}{1-y} \right) ^ 2. The author found that as y \rightarrow 1, \omega \rightarrow |\infty|. The only suggestion the author had was to use a numerical integration
  • #1
nkinar
76
0
Hello---

I've been working on a problem which requires the numerical evaluation of an improper integral. I would like to transform the limits of integration on [tex][0,\infty)[/tex] to the bounded region [tex][a,b][/tex] by replacing the variable [tex]\omega[/tex] with another variable. Here is the integral:

[tex]
u(t,\tau)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\! G(\omega)\, d\omega
[/tex]

[tex]
G(\omega)=4\sqrt{\pi}\frac{\omega^{2}}{\omega_{0}^ {3}}\mbox{exp}\left(-\frac{\omega^{2}}{\omega_{0}^{2}}\right)\mbox{cos \left(\omega t-\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_{0}}\right)^{-\gamma}\omega\tau\right)\mbox{exp}\left(-\frac{1}{2Q}\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_{0}}\right) ^{-\gamma}\omega t\right)}
[/tex]

How should I proceed? Is there a relevant reference which could point me in the proper direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Perhaps contour integration could provide a technique to evaluate real definite integrals? Is there a good textbook/monograph available on contour integration?
 
  • #3
I've found a monograph with some recommended substitutions [1], but I can't immediately see how this would transform the limits of integration.

Here are three recommended substitutions found in the monograph to transform the limits of integration from [tex][0,\infty)[/tex] to [tex][0,1)[/tex], using the variable [tex]y[/tex]:

[tex]
\omega = -\alpha \mbox{log}(1 - y), \alpha > 0
[/tex]

[tex]
\omega = \frac{y}{1-y}
[/tex]

[tex]
\omega = \left ( \frac{y}{1 - y} \right) ^ 2
[/tex]


But what is particularly confusing is that as [tex]y \rightarrow 1[/tex], [tex]\omega \rightarrow |\infty|[/tex].

Is there anything that can be done to transform [tex][0,\infty)[/tex] to [tex][0,1][/tex] or similar?


[1] A.R. Krommer and C.W. Ueberhuber, Computational Integration, Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1998.
 
  • #4
Is there a way to numerically integrate this integral? I've tried to perform the integration on a truncated interval such as [tex][0,1000][/tex] or [tex][0,10000][/tex] instead of [tex][0,\infty)[/tex] but I've found that the truncated integral cannot adequately approximate the improper integral.

There's got to be a way to properly do this.
 
  • #5
Oh, and I've also learned that as [tex]\omega \rightarrow 0[/tex], [tex]G(\omega) \rightarrow \infty[/tex], so the interval over which the integration is performed would have to be [tex](0,\infty)[/tex], or the transformed interval would have to be [tex](0,1)[/tex].
 
  • #6
So perhaps the best way to proceed would be to use a numerical integration procedure which does not use the endpoints of the interval. One of these methods is the "open" Newton-Coates integration method applied to the transformed interval [tex](0, 1)[/tex].
 
  • #7
Okay, well - the following method worked for me. An algorithm to perform adaptive quadrature can be found in the paper by Shampine [1]. This method has been implemented in Matlab as "quadgk." Running the quadgk function on the interval [tex][0,\infty)[/tex] worked well for [tex]u(t, \tau)[/tex] above.[1] L. Shampine, “Vectorized adaptive quadrature in MATLAB,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 211, Feb. 2008, pp. 131-140.
 

FAQ: Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region

What is "Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region"?

"Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region" is a mathematical concept often used in calculus to solve integrals over non-rectangular regions. It involves changing the limits of integration to correspond with the boundaries of the region being integrated over.

Why is it necessary to transform limits of integration to a bounded region?

Transforming the limits of integration to a bounded region allows for the use of standard integration techniques, such as the fundamental theorem of calculus, to solve integrals. It also helps to simplify the integration process and make it more manageable.

How is "Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region" done?

This process involves changing the variables in the integral and setting up new limits of integration that correspond to the boundaries of the region. This can be done using geometric or algebraic methods, depending on the complexity of the region.

What are some common techniques for transforming limits of integration to a bounded region?

Some common techniques include using substitution, splitting the region into smaller subregions, and using symmetry properties to simplify the integration process. It may also involve using trigonometric identities or geometric formulas.

What are some real-world applications of "Transforming limits of integration to a bounded region"?

This concept is used in various fields, such as physics, engineering, and economics, to solve problems involving calculations of volume, area, and other quantities over non-rectangular regions. It is also used in image and signal processing for feature extraction and pattern recognition.

Similar threads

Back
Top