Translating Motion - Which is the most efficient?

  • Thread starter Chantry09
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Motion
In summary, the conversation revolved around the creation of an air powered engine with a twist of being an axial engine. The main focus was on efficiency and the options for achieving it, including the swatch plate, Trebert, wobble plate, barrel cam, radial engine, or a different approach altogether. The target RPM for the engine was 2000-3000.
  • #1
Chantry09
61
0
Hi.

I need some wisdom! Here is my problem. I want to make an air powered engine. This isn't a problem, I have plans for this. However, I want to put my own twist on the engine. I want it to be a axial engine, so the axle is in the same plane as the cylinders.

The importance factor is efficiency, I want this mechanism to convert the energy as efficiently as possible, translating to low start-up torque and high RPM output.

There seems to be a few ways to do this, so if I put down some of my options, can you advise me on the best route.

Option 1. Swatch Plate

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/swash%20plate%20motor3.gif

Option 2. Trebert

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/Trebert%20stationary%20cylinders%20anim.gif

Option 3. Wobble Plate

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/wobble%20plate%20motor1.gif

Option 4. Barrel Cam

LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvtekHPzbUw

Option 5. Radial Engine (I know, the cylinders arnt in the same plane as axle)

[URL]http://www.motorera.com/dictionary/pics/r/radial_engine.jpg[/URL]

Option 6. None of the above!

Id be really interested to hear what your thoughts are on this, and input would be hugely appreciated.

James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
how many rpm do you want to get?
 
  • #3
Pretty interesting and clever design ideas you've found.
 
  • #4
Hi! Thank you, it took me a while to find them. I am looking to get around 2000-3000rpm
 

FAQ: Translating Motion - Which is the most efficient?

What is meant by "translating motion"?

"Translating motion" refers to the movement of an object from one location to another. It is a type of motion that involves a change in an object's position without any rotation or spinning.

How is efficiency measured in translating motion?

The efficiency of translating motion can be measured by the distance an object travels in a certain amount of time. The more distance an object covers in a given time, the more efficient its motion is.

What factors affect the efficiency of translating motion?

The efficiency of translating motion can be affected by factors such as the force applied to the object, the weight of the object, and the type of surface the object is moving on. Friction and air resistance can also impact the efficiency of translating motion.

Which type of motion is considered the most efficient?

In general, straight-line motion is considered to be the most efficient type of translating motion. This is because it involves the least amount of distance traveled and the least amount of energy expended.

How can we increase the efficiency of translating motion?

To increase the efficiency of translating motion, we can reduce the force of friction and air resistance by using smoother surfaces or aerodynamic designs. We can also increase the force applied to the object or decrease its weight to make it easier to move. Additionally, reducing the amount of time it takes for the object to travel a certain distance can also increase its efficiency.

Back
Top