I Translating the harmonic oscillator

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}To get it in terms of ##\psi_n(x)## we could Fourier transform, i.e. (?)
\begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \iint e^{ip(x-x')} e^{-iap} \psi_n(x') dx' dp
\end{align*}It doesn't really look helpful?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Let's say I know the position space wavefunctions of the 1d harmonic oscillator ##\psi_n(x)## corresponding to the state ##| n \rangle## are known. I want to write ##\psi_m(x + a)##, for fixed ##m = 1,2,...##, in terms of all of the ##\psi_n(x)##. I know \begin{align*}
\psi_n(x+a) = \langle x | e^{-iaP}| n \rangle &= \int \langle x | e^{-iaP} | p \rangle \langle p | n \rangle dp \\
&= \int e^{-iap} \langle x | p \rangle \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp \\
&= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int e^{i(x-a)p} \bar{\psi}_n(p) dp
\end{align*}[/tex]
This appears to be related to the fourier shift theorem (see row 102 of the table here).

If you want \psi_n(x + a) as a linear combination of the \psi_n, then look for one. Set <br /> \psi_n(x + a) = \sum_{m} M_{nm} \psi_m(x) and take an appropriate inner product with \psi_k(x) (ideally one with repect to which the \psi_k are orthogonal) to determine the M_{nm}, <br /> \int w(x)\psi_n(x + a)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx = \sum_m M_{nm} \int w(x)\psi_m(x)\bar{\psi}_k(x)\,dx.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
As you can easily see yourself, using your Fourier-decomposition method, you simply got the sign wrong in the very first exponential-operator expression, i.e., you have
$$\langle x|\exp(+\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x | p \rangle \langle p |\exp(\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp(\mathrm{i} p x) \exp(\mathrm{i} p a) \langle p |\psi_n \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \exp[\mathrm{i} p(x+a)] \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p \langle x+a|p \rangle \langle p|\psi_n \rangle= \psi_n(x+a).$$
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top