Is Transverse Strain Zero at the Bolts of a Clamped Circular Membrane?

In summary, the study investigates whether transverse strain is zero at the bolts of a clamped circular membrane under tension. It explores the mechanical behavior of the membrane and the implications of clamping, concluding that while the membrane is constrained at the bolts, the transverse strain is not necessarily zero due to the redistribution of forces and the inherent material properties. The findings highlight the complexity of strain distribution in clamped membranes and the importance of considering these factors in engineering applications.
  • #1
Chrono G. Xay
92
3
TL;DR Summary
I’m trying to do some analysis of an acoustic drum at rest. In an earlier thread of mine I was getting some help verifying the equation for axisymmetric surface tension of a circular membrane. The starting point I chose assumed that the transverse strain of the clamping annulus was either zero or considered negligible. This next analysis assumes the opposite.
The annulus (“rim”) clamping the circular membrane over its cylindrical shell has a number of bolts ‘n’ positioned equidistantly around its perimeter. I’m guessing that the amount of transverse strain at those bolts would be where we might reasonably assume to be zero.

When I was first trying to imagine what general shape the rim would take between any two neighboring bolts I thought of a catenary curve. However, as time went on that made less and less sense. As I kept poking around with a graphing calculator, what seemed to make more sense is something probably akin to a sort of… ‘static’ (my word) amplitude modulating function. Here’s an example of what I’m talking about (in Cartesian coordinates): $$y_1(x) = \frac{a^{-1}\left|{0.5\left[a - sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2 }\right)\right]} \right| sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2}\right)-0.5\left(a-1\right)} b$$
Where ##a ≥ 2## and ##b > 0##.

I’m guessing that a parametrized graph of this line in cylindrical coordinates would be something like… ##r = n, z=y_1(θ)##? Did I use that word correctly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here’s a screenshot of the graphed function (very slightly altered- LaTex below), where ##n = 6##, ##a = 3##, and ##b = 5##:

$$y_1(x) = \frac{\left|{0.5\left[a - sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2 }\right)\right]} \right| sin\left({nπx + \frac π 2}\right)+\left(a-1\right)} {ab}$$
Where ##a ≥ 2## and ##b > 0##.

View attachment 340565

For the sake of clarity: The valleys of the graph indicate the locations of the bolts pulling down on the annulus (“rim”), which pulls the circular membrane taught across the opening of the open-ended cylindrical shell. The peaks then are the transverse strain of the rim.
 
  • #3
The picture I uploaded is giving me errors. Let me try that again…
IMG_7135.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Is Transverse Strain Zero at the Bolts of a Clamped Circular Membrane?

What is transverse strain in the context of a clamped circular membrane?

Transverse strain refers to the deformation that occurs perpendicular to the direction of the applied force or stress. In the context of a clamped circular membrane, it specifically pertains to the strain experienced in the radial direction as opposed to the axial direction.

Why would transverse strain be zero at the bolts of a clamped circular membrane?

Transverse strain might be zero at the bolts because the bolts provide a fixed boundary condition, preventing any radial deformation at those points. This constraint means that the membrane cannot expand or contract in the radial direction at the location of the bolts, resulting in zero transverse strain.

How does the clamping affect the strain distribution in a circular membrane?

Clamping the edges of a circular membrane imposes boundary conditions that affect the strain distribution across the membrane. The fixed edges prevent radial and tangential movements, leading to a complex strain distribution where the strain is typically higher in the central region and reduces towards the clamped edges.

Can the assumption of zero transverse strain at the bolts be applied to all types of materials?

No, the assumption of zero transverse strain at the bolts is generally applicable to idealized or theoretical models. In reality, material properties such as elasticity, plasticity, and anisotropy can affect the actual strain distribution. Therefore, experimental validation is necessary for different materials.

What are some practical implications of assuming zero transverse strain at the bolts in engineering applications?

Assuming zero transverse strain at the bolts can simplify the analysis and design of structures involving clamped circular membranes, such as pressure vessels, diaphragms, and drums. However, engineers must consider the limitations of this assumption and validate it against practical conditions to ensure the reliability and safety of the design.

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
969
Replies
35
Views
27K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top