Triple Integral for Cylindrical Coordinates in a Parabolic Region

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a triple integral in cylindrical coordinates for the function e^(x^2+y^2+z) within a parabolic region defined by the inequalities (x^2+y^2) ≤ z ≤ (x^2+y^2)^(1/2). Participants clarify that the integration limits for z should range from the lower surface z = x^2 + y^2 to the upper surface z = (x^2 + y^2)^(1/2), rather than from 0 to 1. The correct limits for r are determined to be from 0 to 1, while θ varies from 0 to 2π. The integral is ultimately expressed as ∫(θ=0 to 2π) ∫(r=0 to 1) ∫(z=r^2 to r) e^(r^2 + z) r dz dr dθ. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the limits of integration to solve the problem effectively.
robbondo
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the triple integrals \oint\oint\oint_{W}{f(x,y,z)dV:

e^{x^{2}+y^{2}+z}, (x^{2}+y^{2}) \leq z \leq {(x^{2}+y^{2}})^{1/2}

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I know I need to probably switch to cylindrical coordinates. But I'm getting confused about the limits of integration. The way that I see it, since there's no limits of integration for z then the volume which is the between the two parabolas goes to infiniti? But since it's the same above and below the z=0 plane then doesn't that just come out to zero? I don't know I guess if I do the integral from x going from -infiniti to infiniti and use an improper integral from some (a = infiniti) with the limits of integration for z being then from a to a which is obviously zero. I don't think that he would make up a problem like that though. Am I completely wrong in my thinking. THANKS!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You do NOT have two paraboloids- and none of the figure is below the z= 0 plane. z= x^2+ y^2 is a paraboloid with vertex at (0,0,0), axis the z-axis, and opening upward. z= (x^2+ y^2)^{1/2} is the upper half of the cone z^2= x^2+ y^2[/itex]. It does not go to infinity. The two surfaces intersect at z= x^2+ y^2= (x^2+ y^2)^{1/2}. Putting that into cylindrical coordinates makes it particularly easy: z= r^2 and z= r interxect when r^2= r.
 
Ok So know when I try to do the integration am I correct to use the limits of integration of that z goes from 0 to 1 and theta goes from 0 to 2pi and then r goes from root z to z? Also I tried using z from r to r^2 r from 0 to 1 and theta from 0 to 2pi, and they are all giving me strange integrals. Are these limits correct? I'm having a hard time figuring out how to change the limits of integration when switching to cylindrical, especially with regards to r.
 
I'm still having trouble figuring out the limits of integration on this one. Every way that I do it I keep having to take the integral of

x*e^(x^2+x) which as far as I know isn't possible to do. I tried plugging it into a numerical solver and it gave me an exact answer that looked like some sort of estimation. HELP! I have a mid-term Tues. and this determing the limits of integration is going to screw me big time.
 
I'm beginning to think that my teacher made an error in writing this problem. It appears to be unsolvable through all my efforts.
 
No, z does NOT go from 0 to 1. The whole point of what you are doing is that z goes from the lower of those two surfaces (z= x2+ y2) to the higher surface (z= \sqrt{x^2+ y^2}). Since I have already told you that the two surfaces intersect where r2= r- which tells you r= 0 or r= 1, projected down into the z= 0 plane, the two surfaces project the the area from (0,0) to the circle about (0,0) with radius 1. That is, \theta goes from 0 to 2\pi while r goes from 0 to 1.

\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi} \int_{r=0}^1 \int_{z=r^2}^r e^{r^2+ z} rdzdrd\theta[/itex]<br /> I <b>think</b> that&#039;s the integral you need to do. You never <b>did</b> say that f(x,y,z)= e^{x^2+y^2+ z}.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K