Troubles learning Quantum field theory.

AI Thread Summary
Learning Quantum Field Theory (QFT) can be particularly challenging, especially for non-native English speakers who struggle with difficult accents. Many students find that while lectures may seem straightforward, the real difficulty arises during homework, where tedious calculations can lead to confusion and frustration. A common issue is the inability to review lecture notes or textbooks before the next class, making it hard to follow along. Some students have found success in taking detailed notes and catching up later. The choice of textbook also plays a significant role in the learning experience, with Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory" being a popular choice among students, often complemented by Peskin's "Introduction to QFT" for a more comprehensive understanding. Overall, the abundance of online resources is seen as a significant advantage for those studying QFT.
Casco
82
1
Hi everyone, I'm having a lot of troubles learning QFT, personally I find it very challenging, besides that my professor has a very difficult accent and given that I'm not an English native speaker it is really hard for me to follow him. I would like to hear your experience learning QFT, Was it hard? I just want to hear your experience when you first encounter with this wonderful branch of physics.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From my experience, lectures on QFT seem easy and understandable... because everything appears so normal and beautiful let us say...
The problem is when you have to do homeworks- then you understand that nothing is so obvious and a lot of calculations are tedious... eg several times I find myself saying "well at this point, if I've done one mistake it's over, I'll never find where"

I'm not so sure that this topic belongs here (??)
 
Last edited:
I found QFT lectures to be challenging at times. This is mainly because I didn't have time to review the notes or read the textbook before the next class. If I forgot what was discussed in the last class I usually found the current lecture hard to follow. I took good notes though so when I finally got around to catching up on the material I was able to make sense of it all.

This is just my personal experience. Is your professor following a book or is it his own notes?
 
Someone1987 said:
This is just my personal experience. Is your professor following a book or is it his own notes?

My professor is following Srednicki's Quantum Field Theory. I find it very nice nevertheless sometimes is not so great. I think that nowadays we are very lucky to have so many sources of books and learning material in the internet. For instance, I think that Peskin (Introduction to QFT) thogether with Srednicki make a awesame combination to learn QFT.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top