Troubleshooting nuclear decay, electron binding energies, internal contributions

In summary, there is some confusion about the binding energy shells used in a solution, with the correct values being K and L for the binding energies, not L1 and L2 as previously mentioned. The restriction to omit electrons lower than 20kev is also unclear, as the given binding energies are all in the hundreds of keV range. It appears that there may be some typos in the given information.
  • #1
Graham87
70
16
Homework Statement
See pic
Relevant Equations
See pic
How do you know which binding energy shell to use? In the solution it uses K and L2. Why specifically L2 and not L3 or L1 for example?

And what should I do with the information to omit electrons lower than 20kev? I initially thought that meant to omit the electron binding energies lower than 20kev. But L2 which is lower than 20kev is included, so which expression represents electron energy? If it is ΔE - B(L) then shouldn’t L3 be included since it also has a higher energy than 20kev?

1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My guess is that there are some typos as indicated below:
1683822652238.png

The ##L_1## should be ##K## and the ##L_2##'s should just be ##L##. This corresponds with the given binding energies:

1683822987537.png


Perhaps the value ##B(L)_{Hg} = 14.2087## keV is a weighted average over the ##L_1##, ##L_2##, and ##L_3## levels.

I'm not sure about the 20 keV restriction. Since ##\overline E_\beta##, ##B(K)_{Hg}## and ##B(L)_{Hg}## are all in the hundreds of keV, there doesn't appear to be any need to worry about requiring the electrons to have an energy greater than 20 keV.
 
  • Like
Likes Graham87

FAQ: Troubleshooting nuclear decay, electron binding energies, internal contributions

What are the common issues encountered in nuclear decay experiments?

Common issues in nuclear decay experiments include detector inefficiencies, background radiation interference, inaccurate calibration of equipment, and statistical fluctuations in decay counts. Ensuring proper shielding, regular calibration, and using statistical methods to analyze data can mitigate these problems.

How can one accurately measure electron binding energies?

Accurate measurement of electron binding energies can be achieved using techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). These methods rely on the precise detection of emitted electrons and their energies, which requires well-calibrated equipment and controlled experimental conditions.

What are the internal contributions that affect nuclear decay rates?

Internal contributions affecting nuclear decay rates include electron capture, internal conversion processes, and the influence of atomic electron cloud on decay probabilities. These factors can alter the decay rate slightly and must be accounted for in precise measurements.

How do external factors influence nuclear decay and electron binding energies?

External factors such as temperature, pressure, and electromagnetic fields can influence nuclear decay and electron binding energies. For instance, high temperatures can increase the probability of certain decay processes, while external electromagnetic fields can shift binding energies through the Stark or Zeeman effects.

What methods can be used to troubleshoot discrepancies in experimental nuclear decay data?

Troubleshooting discrepancies in nuclear decay data involves checking for equipment malfunctions, verifying the purity of the radioactive sample, ensuring proper shielding from background radiation, and using statistical methods to account for random variations. Cross-referencing with theoretical models and other experimental data can also help identify and correct discrepancies.

Back
Top