Trying to fix a simplification issue for a general range formula

In summary, there was a discussion about a formula for the range of a projectile in a vacuum fired from an arbitrary height. When trying to manipulate the formula, a discrepancy arose when plugging in h=0. However, taking the limit as h approaches 0 from above resolves the issue.
  • #1
FallenLeibniz
86
1
So I have derived a formula for the range of projectile in a vacuum fired from an arbitrary height h from above the ground as the following...

R=(vcosθ/g)[vsinθ+sqrt((vsinθ)^2+2gh)]Now it seems all well and good, but when I try to play with it by multiplying the RHS by the congugate term over the conjugate term (i.e. multiplying by one), I keep coming up with the 2gh factor on top which if h=0 leads to a discrepancy between the two. Can anyone help reconcile this? Note that all factors in the equation are positive values. I can provide a derivation of this equation later if neccessary, but am late to be somewhere and so I must do it later.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not there's a discrepancy. If you plug in h = 0 you will 0/0, which is indeterminate. So the right thing to do is take the limit as h tends to 0 from above, and that will give you sin(2θ)/g, as before.
 
  • #3
Ok, I see the discontinuity now. I feel horrifically blind now.
 
  • #4
Thank you.
 
  • #5


I would suggest taking a step back and carefully reviewing your derivation to ensure that all the steps are correct. It is possible that there may be a simplification error or a missing term that is causing the discrepancy.

Additionally, I would recommend checking your assumptions and the conditions under which the formula was derived. Is the formula valid for all values of h, or are there certain restrictions? Are there any external factors that could affect the accuracy of the formula, such as air resistance or wind?

If the formula is indeed correct and valid, then it may be helpful to approach the problem from a different angle. Instead of trying to manipulate the formula algebraically, you could use numerical methods or simulations to test its accuracy for different values of h and compare the results.

In any case, it is important to thoroughly understand the derivation and assumptions of the formula in order to address any discrepancies and ensure its accuracy.
 

FAQ: Trying to fix a simplification issue for a general range formula

What is a simplification issue for a general range formula?

A simplification issue for a general range formula refers to when a mathematical formula or expression is written in a more complex form than necessary. This can make the formula harder to understand and use, and may also lead to errors.

How can I identify a simplification issue in a general range formula?

To identify a simplification issue in a general range formula, you can start by simplifying the formula manually and checking if the result is equivalent to the original formula. You can also use software or online tools to simplify the formula and compare the results.

Why is it important to fix simplification issues in general range formulas?

Fixing simplification issues in general range formulas is important because it can improve the clarity and accuracy of the formula, making it easier to understand and use. This can also prevent errors and ensure that the formula produces the desired results.

What are some common techniques for fixing simplification issues in general range formulas?

Some common techniques for fixing simplification issues in general range formulas include simplifying the formula manually, using mathematical properties and identities, and breaking down the formula into smaller, simpler parts. Additionally, using software or online tools can also be helpful in identifying and fixing simplification issues.

Is there a standard process for fixing simplification issues in general range formulas?

There is no one standard process for fixing simplification issues in general range formulas, as it may vary depending on the complexity of the formula and the resources available. However, a general approach can involve identifying the simplification issue, finding alternative forms of the formula, and testing the results to ensure accuracy.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top