Turkey Point nuclear powerplant and Irma?

In summary: If they had damage to equipment and lost cooling systems the reactor would heat back up again. That's why you count on getting ECCS equipment delivered.
  • #1
PFreader
3
1
Hi
Sorry, English is not my first language.

Is Turkey Point nuclear powerplant in Florida safe for the storm surge of Irma ?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Good question. I just saw on the news that those power plants are being shut down before the hurricane hits. The plant elevation is only 3 feet above sea level, but there are levees around it. I don't know the height of the levees.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
It's not levees - the the whole site is filled to 18 feet elevation.

It''s the highest ground for miles, plenty of room for water from Biscayne Bay to run around it.

turkey4factchekr.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Jon Richfield, phinds, PFreader and 2 others
  • #4
From @PFreader 's link
my arrow is at Turkey Point
turkey4factchekr2.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #5
Ok, thanks

some Little room for waves.
 
  • #6
PFreader said:
some Little room for waves.
yes you don't need much. . shallow Biscayne Bay, barrier islands and a few miles of reef between plant and deep water

turkey4factchekr3.jpg
 
  • #7
As of right now, Turkey Point isn't going to see hurricane force winds.

They have a requirement to bring both units to cold shutdown at least 2 hours prior to the onset of hurricane force winds.

As part of their FLEX program this allows them to survive for 24 hours without offsite assistance, utilizing portable on site pumps and if necessary, allowing the unit to heat up to mode 4 in natural circulation for the use of the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pumps.

Within 24 hours, the two SAFER facilities in the US can airlift emergency core cooling equipment and install it.

So the risk is very low. We all need to remember that Turkey Point did get a direct hit from hurricane Andrew.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy, Astronuc and FactChecker
  • #8
Hiddencamper said:
We all need to remember that Turkey Point did get a direct hit from hurricane Andrew.
We were without offsite power for a week. Diesels ran fine.

The plant is made of steel and concrete so wasn't bothered much at all..
Cars in parking lot got windows blown out by flying gravel from roofs, some flipped over.
Admin building maintenance shop and security fence got severe wind damage. The water tower (it used to be on East side of plant) blew down , had to repair some plumbing out there.

This one won't compare. With wind out of the South it should actually drop the water level in that end of Biscayne Bay, blowing it up North toward Miami..

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #9
jim hardy said:
With wind out of the South it should actually drop the water level in that end of Biscayne Bay, blowing it up North toward Miami..
turkey4factchekr4.jpg


Hoping Mother Nature doesn't surprise us -

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Nothing to worry about at turkey point with the current track but I wonder about the spent fuel at crystal river npp but not sure of cooling requirements.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #11
HowlerMonkey said:
Nothing to worry about at turkey point with the current track
turkey4factchekr5.jpg


I was never at Crystal River - went past it once in a boat is all.

Maybe we have a PF'er from there ?
 
  • #12
HowlerMonkey said:
Nothing to worry about at turkey point with the current track but I wonder about the spent fuel at crystal river npp but not sure of cooling requirements.

The spent fuel pool doesn't matter any more. That stuff is air coolable now. It's been several years and has decayed sufficiently. It might all be in dry cask storage making the whole issue moot.
 
  • #13
Hiddencamper said:
They have a requirement to bring both units to cold shutdown at least 2 hours prior to the onset of hurricane force winds.

As part of their FLEX program this allows them to survive for 24 hours without offsite assistance, utilizing portable on site pumps and if necessary, allowing the unit to heat up to mode 4 in natural circulation for the use of the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pumps.

Within 24 hours, the two SAFER facilities in the US can airlift emergency core cooling equipment and install it.
Is emergency core cooling equipment needed after a cold shutdown, or is that for other situations?
 
  • #14
FactChecker said:
Is emergency core cooling equipment needed after a cold shutdown, or is that for other situations?

Not dodging your question -
Some of the equipment does double duty . So that equipment is needed but it's not doing emergency cooling .
Example - seawater pumps that provide cooling water to heat exchangers for both emergency and non emergency cooling are of course needed.
"Low Head Safety Injection " function (LHSI) uses same pumps as "Residual Heat Removal" function (RHR) - when you get to cold shutdown you re-align their valves to circulate reactor coolant through heat exchangers for long term core cooling.

So i'd say the complete answer is a qualified yes,
we need pumps and heat exchangers and valves and instruments. Some of it is the same equipment we'd use in an emergency.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #15
If they had damage to equipment and lost cooling systems the reactor would heat back up again. That's why you count on getting ECCS equipment delivered.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #16
Hiddencamper said:
If they had damage to equipment and lost cooling systems the reactor would heat back up again. That's why you count on getting ECCS equipment delivered.
The heat back up time from cold shut down must be far longer than the point from which Fukushima reactors started elevating temperature, 41 minutes after shutdown.
 
  • #17
mheslep said:
The heat back up time from cold shut down must be far longer than the point from which Fukushima reactors started elevating temperature, 41 minutes after shutdown.
That's not an encouraging comparison.
 
  • Like
Likes krater
  • #18
FactChecker said:
That's not an encouraging comparison.
Perhaps due to my sloppy phrasing. There's a point in time after a shutdown where there's no longer enough decay heat to destroy the reactor without active cooling, certainly not enough to melt the vessel. I don't know when that time occurs, though after a cold shut down that path to walk-away-safe is underway. Also, should some catastrophic external event occur that knocks out cooling after a cold shut down, a lot of time remains to remedy the situation (a week?).

By contrast, Fukushima had no such lengthy grace period (quake forced shutdown, and loss of active cooling 41 min later).

Encouraging?
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #19
mheslep said:
a lot of time remains to remedy the situation (a week?).
Encouraging?
Yes. Thanks.
 
  • #20
After getting into cold shutdown it's not uncommon to have a 40-60 degF per hour heatup rate. When I shut my BWR down for refuel we were at 65 degF per hour heatup rate initially on just decay heat. So realistically, being in cold shutdown buys you several hours to do something assuming the vessel is sealed and all safety systems are available.

I know at my plant when we are cold we have our head vent open, so if we lost all power we would have to figure out how to get the vent shut otherwise we would direct boil to the containment atmosphere.

The time until the reactor is walk away safe is months or more. The only passive heat removal from the reactor is thermal radiative, which for a General Electric BWR is assumed to be 1.1MW. So it would take probably over a year technically to be walk away safe.

However cold shutdown buys a tremendous amount of time.

For a hot reactor, a BWR gets around 1 hour and a PWR gets around 2 hours before fuel overheat begins. At Fukushima those units were essentially at rated pressure and temperature so there was no heatup time. Decay heat directly boiled off reactor coolant.

There are a number of reasons you go to cold shutdown. Being cold means little or no pressure, so leaks are minimized. Being cold also means anything can inject to the reactor, including low pressure eccs. This can be good or bad, but at least they are available if needed. Cold shutdown generally improves plant risk, but there are risks getting there as mode 3 operation is a higher risk mode.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep, jim hardy and FactChecker
  • #21
Hiddencamper said:
Being cold also means anything can inject to the reactor, including low pressure eccs.

And if you were in a real jam & needing to do that, since the pipes aren't scalding hot you could get to one to hook something up .

old jim
 

FAQ: Turkey Point nuclear powerplant and Irma?

1. What safety measures are in place at Turkey Point nuclear powerplant to protect against hurricanes like Irma?

Turkey Point nuclear powerplant has several safety measures in place to protect against hurricanes, including a reinforced containment structure for the reactors, backup power sources, and flood barriers.

2. How does Turkey Point nuclear powerplant prepare for a hurricane like Irma?

Turkey Point nuclear powerplant follows a strict protocol for hurricane preparation, which includes securing and removing any loose objects, shutting down non-essential systems, and ensuring all necessary equipment is functioning properly.

3. What is the risk of a nuclear accident at Turkey Point during a hurricane like Irma?

The risk of a nuclear accident at Turkey Point during a hurricane is low due to the plant's design and safety measures in place. In the event of a severe hurricane, the plant has emergency response plans in place to mitigate any potential risks.

4. How has Turkey Point nuclear powerplant handled past hurricanes?

Turkey Point nuclear powerplant has a history of successfully withstanding hurricanes, including Hurricane Andrew in 1992 and Hurricane Wilma in 2005. The plant's safety systems and protocols have been continually improved and tested over the years.

5. What is the plan for Turkey Point nuclear powerplant in the event that Irma causes significant damage?

In the event of significant damage to Turkey Point nuclear powerplant, the plant's operators are prepared to quickly shut down the reactors and begin implementing emergency response plans. The plant has backup generators and other resources to ensure safety and prevent any potential hazards.

Back
Top