Two cylinders rolling without slipping

In summary, the cylinder with the smaller radius (B) must have a smaller moment of inertia, and so it reaches the ground first.
  • #1
smallflight
6
0

Homework Statement


Two cylinders (radius R) start from rest and roll without slipping down ramps. They both have the same masses and moments of inertia. The ramps are both at the same angle. One cylinder (A) is directly on the ramp. The other (B) is hanging from two smaller cylindrical bits (radius r) which stick out from either side and are in contact with the ramp. Which reaches the bottom first?

Homework Equations



τ = I α
τ = F r
mgh
1/2 mv^2
1/2 Iω^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I used torque to figure out which would have the greater ω. The force providing torque is friction, which must be the same for each cylinder (same mass, same normal force). The difference is in r; so the cylinder with the smaller r-value must have the smaller torque and thus the smaller ω at any moment in time. I.e.:

τ = F_f r = I α = I Δω/Δt
ω(t) = (F_f t / I) r

So it would seem that cylinder B, with the smaller r, must also have a smaller ω.

I know that the following is true for both cylinders:
mgh = 1/2 mv^2 + 1/2 Iω^2

So it would seem that cylinder B must have a greater v, because it has a smaller ω.

But I'm confused for a few reasons:
1. For rolling without slipping, v_cm = r ω. So if ω is smaller, so is v. This (obviously) contradicts the conclusion that smaller ω means greater v.
2. If friction is providing torque, it is increasing the rotational kinetic energy of the cylinders. Does that then mean that it is doing work? That would make the energy equation above incorrect (since it assumes zero work is done).
3. When I imagine the problem in my head, cylinder B seems like it should spin faster than cylinder A.

Any insight into this question is very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Mmm... do the cilindrical bits have mass? If they don't, then they would not affect the moment of inertia... If you have some diagram or picture you can upload, if would greatly help in understanding the problem :)
 
  • #3
I don't have a scanner, so I had to make the image myself:

Wx4Ym.png

In case that doesn't work: http://imgur.com/Wx4Ym

The mass of the extra bits on cylinder B can be ignored because both objects have the same total mass and same moment of inertia...
 
  • #4
If both cilinders have the same normal force (which is evenly distributed in the bits), then the friction force is the same, and they come to the floor at the same time. Cilinder B could be lower than A, but I think we can ignore this.
 
  • #5
Thanks, but the prof who asked this question claimed that one of them reached the ground first. Unfortunately I can't remember which and am unable to ask him right now.

They both start with the same potential energy, but once they're rolling, one of them spins faster and so has less translational kinetic energy. Just can't decide which.
 
  • #6
But, if the inner surfaces that are in contact to the two sides (bases) of the cilinder are not frictionless, there would be a reduction of the torque... And they would also reduce kinetic energy...
Anyway, all seems to indicate that they come at the same time.
 
  • #7
But, if the inner surfaces that are in contact to the two sides (bases) of the cilinder are not frictionless, there would be a reduction of the torque... And it would also reduce kinetic energy...
Anyway, ignoring that, all seems to indicate that they come at the same time.
 
  • #8
What indicates that they arrive at the same time? I don't follow your reasoning. You said it's because the friction forces are the same? They are, I think, but they must also provide different torques if they're applied at different distances from the axis of rotation...
 
  • #9
I got it. The difference in the radius of cilinder A and the radius of the bits of cilinder B should account for the difference in angular speed...
 
  • #10
Exactly. (And yes, you can ignore friction between the sides of cylinder B and the inside of the track.)

Any ideas on how to proceed?
 
  • #11
Can you put what you have together with moment of force? That'll help you know which one reaches first.
 
  • #12
Yes, friction forces are applied at different distances from the axis. That said, the torque is greater for cilinder A, and it comes first.
One question: is the lower part of cilinder B contributing to normal force? If it isn't, the problem is now solved.
 
  • #13
I'm guessing it doesn't contribute to anything because B is spinning on an axe Δ which is it itself.
 

FAQ: Two cylinders rolling without slipping

What is rolling without slipping?

Rolling without slipping is a type of rotational motion where a body or object moves forward while simultaneously rotating without any slipping or skidding.

How is rolling without slipping different from rolling with slipping?

In rolling without slipping, the point of contact between the object and the ground is always at rest, while in rolling with slipping, there is relative motion between the object and the ground at the point of contact.

What are the necessary conditions for an object to roll without slipping?

An object must have a circular or cylindrical shape, a force acting on it to create a torque, and a frictional force at its point of contact with the ground to prevent slipping.

How do you calculate the velocity and acceleration of an object rolling without slipping?

The velocity and acceleration can be calculated using the equations v = ωr and a = αr, where v is the linear velocity, ω is the angular velocity, r is the radius of the object, and α is the angular acceleration.

What are some real-life examples of rolling without slipping?

Some examples include a wheel rolling on the ground, a ball rolling down a hill, and a rolling cylinder such as a rolling pin or a rolling office chair.

Similar threads

Back
Top