Two Particles Connected by Massless Rod: Dynamics Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of two point-like particles connected by a massless rod after a collision with a third particle. Participants analyze the conservation of momentum and angular momentum to derive the center of mass velocity and angular velocity post-collision. There is confusion regarding the speed of the colliding mass M after the impact, with some participants questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. Clarifications are sought on how to apply linear and angular momentum conservation principles effectively. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the collision outcomes to solve the dynamics problem correctly.
Booze
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
New user is reminded to show their work on schoolwork problems at PF
Homework Statement
The particle of mass M collapses with the body of two point-like particles of mass m.
Relevant Equations
Help needed
Two point-like particles of mass m. The particles are rigidly connected to each other with a mass-less rod of length L. The particles are initially at rest in such a way that one particle is at the origin and the other is at the point (0, L). A point-like particle of mass M collides with a particle located at the origin with a speed 𝑣⃗0.

a) After the collision, a particle of mass M bounces straight back to its direction of entry. Show that two m-the center of mass of the body formed by the particle must then move so that 𝑉𝑐𝑚 = 𝑀(𝑣0+𝑣)/2𝑚 .
b) Determine the orbital angular momentum 𝐿⃗⃗ 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠 and the rotation rate 𝐿⃗⃗ 𝑟𝑜𝑡 of the given
using quantities (relative to the origin) before and after the collision. What can you say about the total angular momentum value?
c) Show that after the collision, the body of two m-particles rotates counterclockwise with angular velocity 𝜔 = 𝑀(𝑣0+𝑣)/𝑚𝐿.
 

Attachments

  • wt.PNG
    wt.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 117
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Booze ,

:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

Please read the PF homework guidelines. We can only help if you post your attempt at solution.

What have you learned so far that can help you solve this one ?

Oh, and "Help needed" is NOT a relevant equation. :wink:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and topsquark
in question a) I don't get where does come from M(v0+v)!
i did the law of conservation of momentum before=after. i got that 2m is equel M, but i think it is wrong!
in b) i assumed before collision that Lrot is 0 and Ltrans= r(M) x p(M). and after collision i was thinking that Ltrans=r'(M) x p(M) + Rcm x p(body)=r'(M) x M*v0 +Rcm x Vcm*2m= Rcm*Vcm*2m - r'(M)*M*v=...=LM(v0+v)/m-r'(M)Mv
Vcm u know from a) and i calculate Rcm=mL/2m
i got c) right w=Vcm/Rcm= answer
 
Last edited:
Booze said:
in question a) I don't get where does come from M(v0+v)!
i did the law of conservation of momentum before=after. i got that 2m is equel M, but i think it is wrong!
in b) i assumed before collision that Lrot is 0 and Ltrans= r(M) x p(M). and after collision i was thinking that Ltrans=r'(M) x p(M) + Rcm x p(body)=r'(M) x M*v0 +Rcm x Vcm*2m= Rcm*Vcm*2m - r'(M)*M*v=...=LM(v0+v)/m-r'(M)Mv
Vcm u know from a) and i calculate Rcm=mL/2m
i got c) right w=Vcm/Rcm= answer
Please show how you got your result in part (a), specifically how you applied linear momentum conservation. In part (b) you need to consider angular momentum conservation. What is the total angular momentum about the origin before the collision? Hint: ##\mathbf{L}=\mathbf{r}\times\mathbf{p}##. Part (c) will sort itself out after you have obtained correct answers for parts (a) and (b).
 
Last edited:
Booze said:
I don't get where does come from M(v0+v)!
Neither do I unless you are told that M bounces back with speed v (i.e. a velocity -v). Did you leave that out or is it missing from the original?
 
haruspex said:
Neither do I unless you are told that M bounces back with speed v (i.e. a velocity -v). Did you leave that out or is it missing from the original?
I had the same question about the meaning of v. Then I saw in the figure posted in #1 that M is shown bouncing back with speed v.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top