Two questions i had a long time ago

  • Thread starter hexhunter
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Time
In summary, the physics of firearms in space are accurate to a certain degree, but they may not work if fired without air. A plasma grenade would melt glass if fired through it.
  • #1
hexhunter
100
0
one day i was playing halo2, and wondering how accurate the physics are, i came up with two questions

1) if i have an ordinary bullet gun, and i try to fire it in space, will it work? i asked this to my tutor and he said it would only fire with limited force, because the only air is that which is trapped in the bullet's and gun, but he is a chem' teacher so i just wanted to check...

2) if i fire a ball of plasma into ordinary window glass, what will happen, will it melt the glass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
All of the oxygen required for combustion in the bullet casing is contained in the chemicals within the gunpowder. No "air" is required. Anyway, whatever air might be "trapped" in the barrel of the gun would be pushed out in front fo the bullet.

I suppose an old "flint-lock" gun would not work, but modern bullets would work just the same in space.

As for the plasma ball melting glass: it could. IT depends how much plasma you got and how thick the glass is. Even though plasma would be on the order of thousands of degrees, the amount of matter at this temperature is relatively small, so there is not all that much heat. Since we're talking about science fiction here we could say that it is "not impossible."
 
  • #3
thanks,
how about with a hand grenade?

also, if a particle or vacuum has no sign's of avtivity, can you say that within that area there is no time, or that time is inactive?
 
  • #4
hexhunter said:
thanks,
how about with a hand grenade?
Same thing. In the case of all chemical explosives, there is not enough time for the oxygen in the air to get to the combustable materials. Therefore, all the oxygen has to be part of the chemical makeup of the explosive material. This is why, for a grim example, Tim McVeigh needed so much fertilizer to make his truck bomb; the fertilizer was the oxygen supply for the explosion.


also, if a particle or vacuum has no sign's of avtivity, can you say that within that area there is no time, or that time is inactive?
That's philosophical. Someone else can take it.
 
  • #5
hexhunter said:
thanks,
how about with a hand grenade?

Yes, if you fire a hand grenade through a window, it will break the glass :biggrin: .
 
  • #6
LURCH said:
Yes, if you fire a hand grenade through a window, it will break the glass :biggrin: .
Dang, I misunderstood the question! :rolleyes:
 
  • #7
LURCH said:
Yes, if you fire a hand grenade through a window, it will break the glass :biggrin: .
Unless it's a plasma grenade, in which case it will melt its way through. :-p

The gunpowder in a flintlock still contains the oxydizer, so I think the relevant factor would be whether or not the spark from the flint is hot enough in space to initiate the reaction. Since it's essentially in contact with the priming powder, I don't think that it would cool much before taking effect. (Keeping the priming powder in the pan under zero-g is another matter.)
I seem to recall that there's a condition called 'vacuum lock' that can befall any metallic mechanism in space, though. I don't know whether it's due to Van derWaals forces being more effective without air or what, but sometimes the parts can stick to each other enough to impair movement. I'd like some input about that from an expert if possible (Astronuc?) You'd also have to be careful about how the gun is prepared. Most lubricants, for instance, would gel or freeze in space. On the whole, if I had to choose a weapon for space combat, I'd take a Vulcan cannon any day.
 
  • #8
The burning of the chemical propellant in the gun or the detonation of the high explosive in the hand grenade are highly dependent of the ambient temperature. I don't know if at nearly 0 degrees Kelvin the chemical reactions would happen.
 
  • #9
SGT said:
I don't know if at nearly 0 degrees Kelvin the chemical reactions would happen.
Good point. I've seen a lot about how firearms would be the best weapons for space combat, but this has never been addressed. I know even less about chemistry than I do about physics, so now you've got me worried.
 
  • #10
SGT said:
The burning of the chemical propellant in the gun or the detonation of the high explosive in the hand grenade are highly dependent of the ambient temperature. I don't know if at nearly 0 degrees Kelvin the chemical reactions would happen.

Probably not if T was near 0 K , but a hand grenade or gun floating around space near Earth-orbit would be kept well above this temperature due to the sunlight constantly hitting it. I guess the lesson here is, don't keep it in your holster too long.
 
  • #11
hexhunter said:
one day i was playing halo2, and wondering how accurate the physics are, i came up with two questions

1) if i have an ordinary bullet gun, and i try to fire it in space, will it work? i asked this to my tutor and he said it would only fire with limited force, because the only air is that which is trapped in the bullet's and gun, but he is a chem' teacher so i just wanted to check...

2) if i fire a ball of plasma into ordinary window glass, what will happen, will it melt the glass?
I think a halo plasma grenade would break through the glass, not melt through it. Besides, doesn't the plasma grenade explode then, spew plasma everywhere, its not a ball of plasma. The exterior surfaces of the grenade are slightly higher than room temperture, and turn sticky after thrown by a SPARTAN/Covenent troop.
 
  • #12
Mk said:
I think a halo plasma grenade would break through the glass, not melt through it. Besides, doesn't the plasma grenade explode then, spew plasma everywhere, its not a ball of plasma. The exterior surfaces of the grenade are slightly higher than room temperture, and turn sticky after thrown by a SPARTAN/Covenent troop.

in the game it just falls off, something to do with the sticking mechanism i would think, it thinks it's a wall and bounces back
 
  • #13
Mk said:
I think a halo plasma grenade would break through the glass, not melt through it. Besides, doesn't the plasma grenade explode then, spew plasma everywhere, its not a ball of plasma. The exterior surfaces of the grenade are slightly higher than room temperture, and turn sticky after thrown by a SPARTAN/Covenent troop.
Ooops... I forgot that this was about a (game? I've heard of HALO, but don't know what it is other than a type of paratrooper tactic.)
 
  • #14
Chi Meson said:
Probably not if T was near 0 K , but a hand grenade or gun floating around space near Earth-orbit would be kept well above this temperature due to the sunlight constantly hitting it. I guess the lesson here is, don't keep it in your holster too long.

The OP did not mention that the gun or the grenade should be near the Sun or any other star. In deep space the temperature must be very near 0 K.
Even in near Earth-orbit, I doubt that the temperature would be very high. A gun or grenade have a very small area, so they must collect very little solar energy and this is radiated again into space.
I don't know how to calculate the temperature of a black body this size. Can anyone more knowledgeable help?
 

FAQ: Two questions i had a long time ago

What were the two questions you had a long time ago?

The two questions I had a long time ago were: "What is the meaning of life?" and "Is there intelligent life on other planets?"

Did you ever find answers to these questions?

As a scientist, I am constantly seeking answers to questions and exploring new ideas. While I may not have definitive answers to these questions, my understanding and perspective on them have evolved over time.

How have your views on these questions changed?

Through my research and experiences, I have come to understand that the meaning of life is subjective and can vary from person to person. As for the existence of intelligent life on other planets, I believe that the universe is vast and there is a high possibility of other intelligent beings existing.

Do you think these questions will ever be fully answered?

As with many scientific questions, the answers may never be fully known. However, the pursuit of knowledge and understanding is a never-ending journey and we continue to make progress and discoveries through our research and exploration.

How do these questions relate to your work as a scientist?

As a scientist, my goal is to ask questions and seek answers through research and experimentation. These two questions serve as examples of the endless possibilities and mysteries that we, as scientists, strive to uncover and understand.

Similar threads

Back
Top