Two stars orbit their common center of mass

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants explore why both masses (3M and M) are combined in Kepler's third law, leading to the equation T^2 = 4π^2R^3/G(3M + M). The key point is that the orbital period depends on both masses due to the gravitational interaction between them. The two-body problem is analyzed by separating the motion into the center of mass and a Kepler problem, which uses the reduced mass concept. The gravitational potential energy is expressed in terms of the total mass, reinforcing that Kepler's laws apply to the combined mass of the system. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately determining the orbital period of the star with mass 3M.
mancity
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Two stars orbit their common center of mass as shown in the diagram below. The masses of the two stars are 3M and M. The distance between the stars is d.
Determine the period of orbit for the star of mass 3M.
Relevant Equations
T^2=4pi^2R^3/GM
Why do we add the two masses (3M+M=4M) and use that for M in the equation of kepler's 3rd law?
Namely why is it T^2=4pi^2R^3/G(3M+M)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mancity said:
Homework Statement: Two stars orbit their common center of mass as shown in the diagram below. The masses of the two stars are 3M and M. The distance between the stars is d.
Determine the period of orbit for the star of mass 3M.
Relevant Equations: T^2=4pi^2R^3/GM

Why do we add the two masses (3M+M=4M) and use that for M in the equation of kepler's 3rd law?
Namely why is it T^2=4pi^2R^3/G(3M+M)
The period must depend on both masses. After an extensive Internet search I found this:

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/features/yba/CygX1_mass/binary/equation_derive.html
 
Stated somewhat differently: The two-body problem separates into the linear motion of the center of mass and a Kepler problem for the separation vector. The Kepler problem has a mass that is the reduced mass ##\mu = m_1 m_2/(m_1 + m_2)## of the system and the Kepler potential is the usual Newtonian gravitational potential based on the two masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Because of this, the potential per reduced mass is given by
$$
- G\frac{m_1 + m_2}{r}.
$$
This Kepler problem is what Kepler's laws apply to and therefore the mass in the 3rd law is ##m_1 + m_2##.
 
  • Like
Likes mancity, SammyS, nasu and 1 other person
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top