Two supposedly simple Standard Normal questions

In summary, to find the value of c in terms of σ such that P(μ-c ≤ X ≤ μ + c) = 0.95, you would standardize the random variable and then use the standard normal distribution to find the value of c. To find the density of Y = |X| when X ~ N(0,σ2), you would draw a line and shade in the region that satisfies |x| ≤ y, then use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to obtain the density in terms of y. For a uniform distribution, you would put the "y" value into the PDF of 1/(b-a) to obtain the density in terms of y.
  • #1
trap101
342
0
1) If X~N(μ,σ2, find the value of c in terms of σ such that P(μ-c ≤ X ≤ μ + c) = 0.95


Attempt: Ok so I have a feeling I will eventually need to reference a standard normal table, but I tried to standardize the rv first:

P (-1 ≤ (X-μ)/c ≤ 1 ) = 0.95

Now here's where I'm stuck, what trait of normal distributions am I missing to apply here?


2) If X ~ N(0,σ2), find the density of Y = |X|.

Attempt: FY(y) = P(Y≤y)
= P( |X| ≤ y)

How do I handle the absolute value bars? Would I have to have 2 cases and if so how do I brign those together in order to have a proper change of variables?


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
trap101 said:
1) If X~N(μ,σ2, find the value of c in terms of σ such that P(μ-c ≤ X ≤ μ + c) = 0.95


Attempt: Ok so I have a feeling I will eventually need to reference a standard normal table, but I tried to standardize the rv first:

P (-1 ≤ (X-μ)/c ≤ 1 ) = 0.95

Now here's where I'm stuck, what trait of normal distributions am I missing to apply here?


2) If X ~ N(0,σ2), find the density of Y = |X|.

Attempt: FY(y) = P(Y≤y)
= P( |X| ≤ y)

How do I handle the absolute value bars? Would I have to have 2 cases and if so how do I brign those together in order to have a proper change of variables?


Thanks

You handle the absolute value by drawing a line (for X) then shading in that portion of the line that satisfies |x| <= y. What region do you get?

RGV
 
  • #3
Ray Vickson said:
You handle the absolute value by drawing a line (for X) then shading in that portion of the line that satisfies |x| <= y. What region do you get?

RGV



If I'm understanding you right, the portion that is shaded in would be everything up to but not including y. In my head I have a picture of the normal distribution graph usually how it's shown in books.
 
  • #4
trap101 said:
If I'm understanding you right, the portion that is shaded in would be everything up to but not including y. In my head I have a picture of the normal distribution graph usually how it's shown in books.

Why wouldn't include y: don't we have |y|<=y for y>0?

If y = 2, would x = -7 be in the set |x|<=y? Would x → -∞ satisfy |x| <= y?

For now forget about your mental picture of the normal distribution, and just concentrate on getting the region correct. Once you have done that, go back to thinking about the normal distribution.

RGV
 
  • #5
Ray Vickson said:
Why wouldn't include y: don't we have |y|<=y for y>0?

If y = 2, would x = -7 be in the set |x|<=y? Would x → -∞ satisfy |x| <= y?

For now forget about your mental picture of the normal distribution, and just concentrate on getting the region correct. Once you have done that, go back to thinking about the normal distribution.

RGV




Ok, I see what your getting at, so I drew the graph for the absolute value of |x| and everything underneath the graph from both sides would be in the region, I just realized too though that |x| ≤ y <==> -y≤ X ≤ y. But back to the graph idea, so with me drawing that graph how does that relate to the normal distribution or any distribution for that matter?


So the set would be all values of X which are equal to or less in absolute value to y. By FTC I cold switch it into:

FX(y) - FX(-y)

then differentiating to get the densities:

fX(y) + fX(-y)

Then put these into the normal and I would have the density?
 
  • #6
trap101 said:
Ok, I see what your getting at, so I drew the graph for the absolute value of |x| and everything underneath the graph from both sides would be in the region, I just realized too though that |x| ≤ y <==> -y≤ X ≤ y. But back to the graph idea, so with me drawing that graph how does that relate to the normal distribution or any distribution for that matter?


So the set would be all values of X which are equal to or less in absolute value to y. By FTC I cold switch it into:

FX(y) - FX(-y)

then differentiating to get the densities:

fX(y) + fX(-y)

Then put these into the normal and I would have the density?

Yes.

RGV
 
  • #7
Awesome. Thanks. I had a quick question in terms of the uniform distribution. So I had to do a similar change of variable process and I arrived at fX(y). Now say I have been given the uniform density, where would I put my "y" value into to obtain the density in terms of y's since the PDF of a uniform is 1/(b-a)?
 

FAQ: Two supposedly simple Standard Normal questions

What is the Standard Normal distribution?

The Standard Normal distribution, also known as the z-distribution, is a probability distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. It is a continuous, symmetric bell-shaped curve that is commonly used in statistics to represent a variety of real-world phenomena.

How is the Standard Normal distribution different from other normal distributions?

The Standard Normal distribution is a specific type of normal distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. Other normal distributions can have different means and standard deviations, resulting in different shapes and locations of the curve.

How do you calculate probabilities for the Standard Normal distribution?

Probabilities for the Standard Normal distribution can be calculated using a table of z-scores, also known as a Standard Normal table. This table provides the area under the curve for different z-scores, allowing you to find the probability of a specific range of values.

What is the purpose of using the Standard Normal distribution in statistics?

The Standard Normal distribution is often used in statistics as a reference distribution for other normal distributions. By converting data to z-scores and using the Standard Normal table, we can compare and analyze different sets of data with different means and standard deviations.

Can the Standard Normal distribution be used for any type of data?

The Standard Normal distribution is often used for continuous data that is roughly symmetrical and bell-shaped. However, it may not be appropriate for all types of data and should be used with caution. Other distributions, such as the binomial or exponential distribution, may be more suitable for certain types of data.

Similar threads

Back
Top