MHB Tyler's question at Yahoo Answers (linear independence)

AI Thread Summary
If the set {w1, ... wm} is linearly independent in a vector space V, then the corresponding set of coordinate vectors {[w1]B, ... [wm]B} is also linearly independent in Rn. This is demonstrated using properties of vector representation in a fixed basis B, including linearity and the uniqueness of representation for the zero vector. By assuming a linear combination of the coordinate vectors equals zero, it leads to a conclusion that the original vectors must also combine to zero, contradicting their independence. Therefore, the linear independence of the original set guarantees the linear independence of the transformed set in Rn. This establishes a fundamental relationship between linear independence in different vector spaces.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Show that if {w1, ... wm} is linearly independent in V, then {[w1]B , ... [wm]B} is linearly independent in Rn.

Here is a link to the question:

Linear algebra help please please? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Tyler,

Fixing a basis $B=\{w_1,\ldots,w_m\}$ of a real vector space $V$ we know that

$(i)\;[x+y]_B=[x]_B+[y]_B$ or all $x,y\in V$.
$(ii)\;[\lambda x]_B=\lambda [x]_B$ for all $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$.
$(iii)\;[x]_B=(0,\ldots ,0)\Leftrightarrow x=0$.

Suppose $\lambda_1 [w_1]_B +\ldots +\lambda_m [w_m]_B=(0,\ldots ,0)$. Using $(i)$ and $(ii)$:
$$[\lambda_1 w_1 +\ldots +\lambda_m w_m]_B=(0,\ldots, 0)$$
Using $(iii)$: $\lambda_1 w_1 +\ldots +\lambda_m w_m=0$.

By hypothesis $ \{w_1,\ldots ,w_m\}$ are linearly independent, so $\lambda_1=\ldots =\lambda_m=0$. This proves that $\{[w_1]_B,\ldots,[w_m]_B\}$ are linearly independent.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top