U.S. Spam %: P=13+45*ln*x (2003) - Right or Wrong?

  • Thread starter poohbear1986
  • Start date
In summary, P=13+45*ln*x represents the percentage of inbound e-mail in the U.S. that is considered spam, where x is the number of years after 2000. Using the year 2003, the result is approximately 62.5% spam. This model predicts that all email will be spam as of November of last year.
  • #1
poohbear1986
20
0
P=13+45*ln*x represents the percentage of inbound e-mail in the U.S. that is considered spam, where x is the number of years after 2000. say you use 2003, i keep figurin out this out and i get 12.18 and 5.045, i like to have someone tell me if I am right or wrong
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
poohbear1986 said:
P=13+45*ln*x represents the percentage of inbound e-mail in the U.S. that is considered spam, where x is the number of years after 2000. say you use 2003, i keep figurin out this out and i get 12.18 and 5.045, i like to have someone tell me if I am right or wrong

Do you mean [tex] \[
P = 13 + 45\ln (x)
\]
[/tex] ?

The natural log of 3 is about 1.0986, or close to 1.10,
so in your example, P = 62.5
 
Last edited:
  • #3
symbolipoint said:
Do you mean [tex] \[
P = 13 + 45\ln (x)
\]
[/tex] ?

What a model... it suggests that all email will be spam as of November of last year.
 
  • #4
CRGreathouse said:
What a model... it suggests that all email will be spam as of November of last year.

Pretty much matches my inbox :smile:
 

FAQ: U.S. Spam %: P=13+45*ln*x (2003) - Right or Wrong?

Is the formula for "U.S. Spam %: P=13+45*ln*x (2003)" correct?

Yes, the formula is correct. It follows the form of a logarithmic function, with x representing the year 2003 and P representing the percentage of spam in the United States at that time.

What does the "ln" in the formula stand for?

"ln" stands for the natural logarithm, which is a mathematical function used to calculate the logarithm of a number to the base e (approximately 2.718).

Why is the year 2003 used in the formula?

The year 2003 is used because it was a significant year in terms of the increase in spam email. It was also the year that the United States passed the CAN-SPAM Act, which aimed to reduce the amount of spam sent to American email users.

Is this formula still relevant today?

No, this formula is not relevant today as it only applies to the year 2003. The percentage of spam in the United States has changed significantly since then, and the formula does not account for any other variables or factors that may affect the percentage of spam.

How accurate is this formula?

The accuracy of this formula is difficult to determine as it only takes into account one variable (the year) and does not consider any other factors that may affect the percentage of spam. Additionally, the data used to create this formula is from the year 2003, so it may not accurately reflect the current state of spam in the United States.

Back
Top