Uncertainty principle for electron inside atom

So, for example, if the energy of a state is -13.6 eV then the expectation value of the kinetic energy should be 13.6 eV.In summary, the conversation discusses the uncertainty in the momentum of an electron that is confined to a region of space the size of an atom, and the resulting kinetic energy. The uncertainty in the momentum is determined to be 5.5e-25 kgm/s, which is considered reasonable due to the small size of the electron and the uncertainty principle. The kinetic energy is calculated to be 6.05e-19 J, which is compared to the energy levels of a hydrogen atom (13.6 eV for ground state), indicating that it is unreasonably low
  • #1
leehufford
98
1

Homework Statement


Hopefully it is not a faux pas to post two questions relatively close together in time. This is more of a conceptual question than a calculation based question.

An electron is confined to a region of space of the size of an atom (0.1 nm). a) What is the uncertainty in the momentum of the electron? b) What is the kinetic energy of an electron with momentum equal to delta p? c) Does this give a reasonable value for the kinetic energy of an electron inside an atom?

Homework Equations


(delta x)(delta p) ~ (h bar)

The Attempt at a Solution



a) (h bar)/(delta x) ~ delta p = (1.05e-34 Js)/(0.1 nm) = 1.05e-24 kgm/s.
b) delta p = sqrt(2mK). K = 6.05e-19 J.
c) I don't know.

I feel like the uncertainty in momentum is very small, which is odd, because I thought the uncertainty in x was very small...maybe I don't have the proper perspective here. When either delta x or delta p are small, the other should be large. Also, I have no basis for whether this 6.05e-19 J, which should be 3.78 eV, is reasonable or not. Is it "supposed" to be reasonable, or is the point of this question to discover that it is not reasonable? Thanks in advance,

Lee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The uncertainty is delta x delta p >= (hbar)/2 so you want (h bar)/(2*delta x) ~ delta p = (1.05e-34 Js)/(2*(0.1 nm)) = 5.5e-25. Second, consider the possibilities of momentum in that small amount of space. The wavelength of the electron would have to be less than 0.1nm so the smallest momentum would be p=h/0.1nm=6.626e-24. Or p = (6.626 + or - .55) e-24. This seems like a decent uncertainty in momentum to me because the uncertainty will be at most 8.3% of the momentum.

As for a reasonable KE, we already showed that the smallest the momentum can be within the 0.1nm atom is 6.626e-24. A momentum that is more than 10 times (i.e. 5.5e-25) less implies that the KE will be 100 times less than what it should be within that space of the atom.

Let me know if you see any flaws in my calculations or logic. It's been a couple of years since i was in quantum.
 
  • #3
Thank you for the response. In our book, the reasoning goes that since the uncertainty is >= h bar/2, we will almost certainly do worse than h bar/2, so our book says that delta p delta x ~ h bar is a reasonable estimate, and at the end of the chapter it lists this formula, with the (1/2) dropped from the equation. Do the results imply that a 0.1 nm uncertainty in position is a large uncertainty?

As for your logic, I followed the first paragraph but sort of got lost in the second one. Are you saying the KE is reasonable, or not so much? Thanks again,

Lee
 
  • #4
Considering the size of an electron compared to an atom, yes, an uncertainty of 0.1nm (about ten times the diameter of one hydrogen atom) is very large.

As for KE: I believe I'm correct in calculating the smallest possible momentum. If you compare the momentum uncertainty to the smallest momentum, you'll see that the uncertainty is more than 10 times less. If you were to use the momentum uncertainty to calculate KEu and compare it to the smallest momentum to calculate KEs, then you'll see that the KEu is more than 100 times less than KEs. Meaning the smallest KE possible is still 100 times more than KEu. Meaning, with the given uncertainty, KEu is physically impossible.
 
  • #5
0.1 nm is one angstrom. I think you have your units backwards there.
 
  • #6
Ah, you're right. The diameter of hydrogen is about 0.1nm. Even so, an electron is very small compared to the size of one hydrogen atom. I would still assert that 0.1nm is a large uncertainty for x.
 
  • #7
Thanks again for the reply. I agree than 0.1 nm is large compared to a basically point object (electron). I'm not sure where you are getting terms like "smallest kinetic energy" from. If the KE is unreasonable, would you happen to know what a common electron energy inside an atom is? I know its different for different energy levels and different atoms, but if my KE is unreasonable it should be very different from the average or sample values.

Lee
 
  • #8
I think to see whether it's reasonable we need to compare it to the energy levels of the hydrogen atom - it's 13.6eV for ground state. How does your answer compare to that?
 
  • #9
What is a "large" uncertainty in position is quite arbitrary. The main thing to notice is that ##\hbar## is a very small number when expressed in Js so if you are using SI units you will get small numbers no matter what.

Based on the virial theorem, the kinetic energy in a bound state should equal the absolute value of the energy of the state (note that the bound state energy is typically taken as being negative with unbound states having positive energy).
 

Related to Uncertainty principle for electron inside atom

What is the uncertainty principle for an electron inside an atom?

The uncertainty principle states that it is impossible to know the exact position and momentum of an electron simultaneously. This means that the more accurately we know the position of an electron, the less we know about its momentum and vice versa.

What is the significance of the uncertainty principle for electron inside an atom?

The uncertainty principle has significant implications for our understanding of the behavior of electrons in atoms. It explains why electrons do not spiral into the nucleus and helps us understand the stability of atoms.

How does the uncertainty principle affect our ability to measure the properties of electrons inside an atom?

The uncertainty principle places a fundamental limit on our ability to measure the properties of electrons inside an atom. This means that we can never know the exact position and momentum of an electron at the same time, and our measurements will always have some degree of uncertainty.

Can the uncertainty principle be violated or overcome?

No, the uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics and cannot be violated or overcome. However, there are ways to minimize the uncertainty in measurements, such as using advanced techniques and instruments.

How does the uncertainty principle relate to the wave-particle duality of electrons?

The uncertainty principle is closely related to the wave-particle duality of electrons. It suggests that electrons can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior, and the uncertainty in their position and momentum is a consequence of this duality.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
587
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
778
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top