Unclear formulation of Ward identity

In summary, the Ward-Takashi identity can be formulated as k_{\mu}M^{\mu\nu}=0, using the fact that the longitudinal polarization of the 4 vector A is nonphysical. However, when studying QED, a formula -\frac{1}{\alpha}\Box\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} + \partial^{\mu}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta A^{\mu}} + ie\psi\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\psi} -ie\bar{\psi}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\bar{\psi}}=0 was encountered, which is not clear. This formula can be derived from \Gamma [\
  • #1
IRobot
87
0
Hello,

I am really familiar with the Ward-Takashi identity formulated in the form [itex]k_{\mu}M^{\mu\nu}=0[/itex] applying the fact that the longitudinal polarization of the 4 vector A is nonphysical (redundant) and should not contribute to the physical amplitudes. But, by opening a test subject on QED, I ran into this formula: [itex] -\frac{1}{\alpha}\Box\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu} + \partial^{\mu}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta A^{\mu}} + ie\psi\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\psi} -ie\bar{\psi}\frac{\delta\Gamma}{\delta\bar{\psi}}=0[/itex] which is quite unclear for me. [itex]\Gamma [\psi,\bar{\psi},A][/itex] is the generator of 1PI graphs. Does someone have a reference on the derivation of that, or could show me how to get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Section 12.1, eq. 12.13 in Kaku "Quantum Field Theory - A modern introduction" (1993)
 
  • #3
Thanks, I checked in Kaku's book, and indeed it's not hard to derive, by playing with [itex]Z[\eta,\bar{\eta},J^{\mu}][/itex] and [itex]\Gamma[\psi,\bar{\psi},A^{\mu}][/itex].
 

FAQ: Unclear formulation of Ward identity

What is the Ward identity?

The Ward identity is a mathematical relation between Green's functions, which are used to describe the behavior of particles in quantum field theory. It is a fundamental principle that ensures the consistency of a theory and can be used to derive important physical results.

Why is the formulation of Ward identity sometimes considered unclear?

The formulation of Ward identity can be considered unclear because it involves complex mathematical equations and concepts that can be difficult to understand for those without a strong background in quantum field theory. Additionally, different versions of the Ward identity have been proposed, causing confusion and debate among scientists.

How is the Ward identity used in physics?

The Ward identity is used in physics to ensure the conservation of certain quantities, such as electric charge and momentum, in physical processes. It is also used to derive important physical quantities, such as scattering amplitudes, in quantum field theory.

Can the Ward identity be violated?

In its correct formulation, the Ward identity cannot be violated. However, there are cases where the identity may appear to be violated due to approximations or incorrect calculations. This can lead to further research and refinement of the theory.

Is the Ward identity still an area of active research?

Yes, the Ward identity continues to be an area of active research in theoretical physics. Scientists are constantly working to refine and better understand the identity, as well as its applications in various fields, such as particle physics and condensed matter physics.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top