- #1
TSN79
- 424
- 0
Several apartments have under floor heating (water) with a common boiler room and a central pump. There is no pump in the apartments. Each pipe run on each apartment's manifold has its own flow-indicator. The owner of one apartment is worried that if the neighbor turns off its heating, then more water will be forced through her manifold - increasing the usage and cost (they only have volumetric meters). They don't have any valves installed to prevent overflow to each apartment.
Some argue that even if this is the case, this will only result in the apartment being heated a bit quicker, and so the manifold actuator will close a bit earlier than it otherwise would - and there will be no difference in final cost. I can understand the reasoning, but I'm unsure if it's that easy. If she receives 20% more water, does that mean that the apartment will reach its set room temperature 20% earlier?
Some argue that even if this is the case, this will only result in the apartment being heated a bit quicker, and so the manifold actuator will close a bit earlier than it otherwise would - and there will be no difference in final cost. I can understand the reasoning, but I'm unsure if it's that easy. If she receives 20% more water, does that mean that the apartment will reach its set room temperature 20% earlier?