Understanding Electrostatics: How Does the Charge Sign Affect the Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SS2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the impact of charge signs on electrostatic formulas, specifically voltage and force equations. In the voltage formula v = kq1/r + kq2/r, a negative charge does indeed affect the equation, resulting in a negative term for that charge. Conversely, in the force equation f = kq1q2/r^2, the sign of the charges determines whether the force is attractive or repulsive. The participants emphasize that while negative charges influence the calculations, the overall context, including distance, is crucial for accurate results. Understanding these nuances is essential for solving electrostatic problems effectively.
SS2006
80
0
the formula

v = kq1/r +kq2/r

if a charge is -2 micro couloumbs for instance is that put into the equatoin and it becomes minused instead or the sign doesn't effect q in the formula

cuase i remmeber in the f = kq1q2
the sign has no effect
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mkay, for your first concern, the formula for voltage is correct. The thing is though is that the formula has q1 and q2, which are different charges, which can either be positive or negative. And yes, if the charge is negative, then yes, that particular term of the equation (which by the way, you can use for as many charges as you'd like) becomes negative.

AS for your second claim, the electric force between two particles is kq1q2/r^2! Very important is the sign(how much like yoda did I just sound there). In this case, the charge of the q's will determine whether the force will be attractive (negative sign) or repulsive (positive). Hopefully that asnwered your question.
 
ur right about the force part, i meant it i don't use it in the equation to find the Force magnitude, then i can draw FBD's to see which way itll go , cause of positive or negative, thanks a lot man!

So for the Voltage equation, if one q is -2 microcouloumbs
then i minus the whole kq1/r term right
 
like i have 1, 18000 volts, the second was 9000 volts, and the third also 9000 volts but the coulumb charge was -2, instead of 2 like the first
so does that mean the final voltage is only 18000,
so a negative couloumb charge actually subtractsf rom the total voltage?
 
Hmm, don't eaxctly see where you are going with this. You give voltage results and the chare, but no distance r...seems to me that ur missing something. Post the problem exactly as it's worded and i'll try and lead you into the right direction.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top