Understanding Inf & Sup in Riemann Sums

In summary, the infimum and supremum of a set are the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound. They are similar to the maximum and minimum, but they can be defined for any set with a lower or upper bound.
  • #1
Bashyboy
1,421
5
I am currently reading about riemann sums and several different sources uses these abbreviations, inf and sup, and I am not certain what they mean. Could someone explain them to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
They are the infimum and the supremum.

The supremum of a set A is the least upper bound and the infimum is the greatest lower bound.

For example, consider the set [0,1]. This has many upper bounds. For example, 2, 10, 10020330 are all upper bounds. But 1 is the smallest such upper bound. Thus 1 is the supremum.

In the previous example, 1 was actually a maximum: that is, the greatest element contained in the set. But a supremum does not need to be contained in the set. For example, ]0,1[ (or (0,1) in other notation) also has 1 as smallest upper bound. Every element smaller than 1 will not be an upper bound anymore. Thus 1 is the supremum of the set.

The same discussion holds for infima.
For example: [tex]inf ]0,2[ = 0[/tex] or somewhat more complicated [tex]inf \{1/n~\vert~n\in \mathbb{N}\}=0[/tex] (note that I take [itex]0\in \mathbb{N}[/itex]).
 
  • #3
So, are the words, in a way, synonymous to minimum and maximum?
 
  • #4
Also, since this particular thread pertains to riemann sums, is the reason why the definite integral is defined as the limit of the riemann sum simply because they produce the same result, or is there some deeper meaning? And what was the definite integral defined as before Bernhard Riemann came along?
 
  • #5
Bashyboy said:
So, are the words, in a way, synonymous to minimum and maximum?

No! That was the entire point. The supremum is a generalization of the maximum.
When I say that an element x is the maximum of A, then this means that x is the greatest element contained in A. So it is implied that x is an element of A.
But with the supremum, x does not need to be an element of A. For example sup ]0,1[ = 1, but 1 is not an element of ]0,1[.
 
  • #6
For example, the open interval, (0, 1)= {x| 0< x< 1}, does not have a "minimum" or maximum. But its inf (also called "greatest lower bound") is 0 and its sup (also called "least upper bound") is 1.

If a set has a "minimum" then its infimum is that minimum. Similarly, if a a set has a "maximum" then its supremum is that maximum. But any set with a lower bound has an infimum but not necessarily a "minimum" and any set with an upper bound has a supremum but not necessarily a "maximum".

(Some texts allow "[itex]-\infty[/itex]" as an infimum and "[itex]\infty[/itex]" as a supremum so that a set does not have to be bounded to have infimum and supremum.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Understanding Inf & Sup in Riemann Sums

1. What is a Riemann Sum?

A Riemann Sum is a method used in calculus to approximate the area under a curve by dividing it into smaller rectangles and summing their areas. It is named after the 19th century mathematician Bernhard Riemann.

2. What is the significance of understanding Inf & Sup in Riemann Sums?

Inf & Sup, short for infimum and supremum, refer to the smallest and largest possible values of a set. In Riemann Sums, understanding these values is crucial as they determine the accuracy of the approximation of the area under the curve. The closer the infimum and supremum are to the actual area, the more accurate the Riemann Sum will be.

3. How do you calculate Inf & Sup in Riemann Sums?

To calculate the infimum and supremum in Riemann Sums, you need to divide the interval of the function into smaller subintervals and find the minimum and maximum values of the function within each subinterval. The infimum is then the smallest of these minimum values, and the supremum is the largest of the maximum values.

4. What are the different types of Riemann Sums?

There are three main types of Riemann Sums: Left Endpoint Riemann Sum, Right Endpoint Riemann Sum, and Midpoint Riemann Sum. The difference between these lies in the points at which the rectangles are drawn to approximate the area under the curve.

5. How is the accuracy of a Riemann Sum determined?

The accuracy of a Riemann Sum is determined by the number of subintervals used. The more subintervals, the closer the approximation will be to the actual area under the curve. However, it should be noted that even with an infinite number of subintervals, the Riemann Sum will still be an approximation and not an exact value.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
830
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
978
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top