Understanding Integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y)

In summary, integrating lambda(t) = l1(y + a1t) from 0 to t gives (I/a1) (L1(y + a1t) - L1(y)), where L'1(x) = l1(x), and integrating lambda(t) = l0(y - a0t) from 0 to t gives - (I/a0) (L0(y - a0t) - L1(y)), where L'0(x) = l0(x). These results can be derived using the method of Integration by substitution, which is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule of derivatives.
  • #1
Ad VanderVen
169
13
TL;DR Summary
Forms (I/a) (L(y + a t) - L( y)) and - (I/a) (L(y - a t) - L( y)).
I have the following function l1(y)=c1. Integrating lambda(t) = l1(y + a1t) from 0 to t gives (I/a1) (L1(y + a1t) - L1(y)), where L'1(x) = l1(x). Now I don't understand why that is.

Similarly, I have the following function l0(y)=c0/y. Integrating lambda(t) = l0(y - a0t) from 0 to t gives - (I/a0) (L0(y - a0t) - L1(y)), where L'0(x) = l0(x). Now I don't understand again why that is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
I think it is readable now.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes berkeman and PeroK
  • #4
Hmmmm, do you understand the method of Integration by substitution? If not then try to read the following link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_substitution

You might find other links in the web, as well as youtube videos. Just search by "Integration by substitution" or "Integration by change of variables".

Integration by substitution is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule of derivatives.
 
  • #5
Delta2 said:
Hmmmm, do you understand the method of Integration by substitution? If not then try to read the following link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_substitution

You might find other links in the web, as well as youtube videos. Just search by "Integration by substitution" or "Integration by change of variables".

Integration by substitution is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule of derivatives.

What would I get if I have the following function l(y)=c and I integrate lambda(t) = l(1/(1/y + at)) from 0 to t?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Ad VanderVen said:
What would I get if I have the following function l(y)=c and I integrate lambda(t) = l(1/(1/y + at)) from 0 to t?
Is ##c## constant with respect to ##y##?
 
  • #7
Yes.
 
  • #8
Ad VanderVen said:
Yes.
Then you would get ##ct## which is (if you do the algebraic operations) equal to $$\frac{1}{a}(L(y+at)-L(y))$$ with $$L'(x)=I(x)=c$$ or simply $$L(x)=cx+d$$.

But you haven't answered, have you looked for resources for integration by substitution? Both of the things you mention at the OP can be derived relatively easy with integration by substitution.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Understanding Integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y)

1. What is the purpose of integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y)?

The purpose of integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) is to improve the performance of machine learning algorithms. By incorporating a regularization term (Lambda) with the l1 and l0 norms of the output variable (y), the algorithm is able to select the most relevant features and reduce the complexity of the model, leading to better generalization and prediction accuracy.

2. How does integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) work?

Integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) works by adding a regularization term to the cost function of the machine learning algorithm. This regularization term penalizes the model for having too many non-zero coefficients (l1 norm) or too many non-zero features (l0 norm) in the output variable, encouraging the model to select only the most important features for prediction.

3. What are the benefits of integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y)?

The benefits of integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) include improved model performance, better generalization, and increased interpretability. By reducing the complexity of the model, it becomes easier to understand and interpret the relationship between the input and output variables, making it more useful for real-world applications.

4. Can Lambda be adjusted to control the level of regularization?

Yes, Lambda can be adjusted to control the level of regularization. A higher value of Lambda will result in stronger regularization, leading to a simpler model with fewer non-zero coefficients or features. On the other hand, a lower value of Lambda will result in weaker regularization, allowing the model to use more coefficients or features for prediction.

5. How does integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) compare to other regularization techniques?

Integrating Lambda with l1(y) and l0(y) is a form of "sparsity-inducing" regularization, which encourages the model to select only the most important features for prediction. This differs from other regularization techniques such as L2 regularization, which penalizes the model for having large coefficients but does not necessarily result in sparsity. Depending on the dataset and the problem at hand, one regularization technique may be more effective than the other.

Similar threads

I I think the special theory of relativity self-contradicts
Replies
32
Views
2K
I On inverse function theorem in Spivak's CoM
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Different norms and how L1 leads to the sparsest solution
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Curl operator for time-varying vector
Replies
1
Views
393
I How to manipulate functions that are not explicitly given?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Calculating the change of the volume of a sphere using this integral
Replies
3
Views
2K
Issue with behavior of ray-plane intersection algorithm
Replies
7
Views
2K
I The Euler-Lagrange equation and the Beltrami identity
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Interpretation of Lagrangian solution (complex numbers)
Replies
2
Views
851
B Calculating shaded area: I'm getting discrepancies between methods
Replies
3
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top