Understanding Limit Factorization Intuitively

In summary: And the answer is "Yes, there are many ways to do it, but one way is to factorize it." In summary, pasmith is asking if there is a way to simplify an algebraic fraction without factorizing it.
  • #1
scientifico
181
0
Hello, why I can't directly find lim x->3 (x^2+2x-15)/(x^2-5x+6) but I have to factorize them ?
Is there any intuitive way to understand that ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have a 0/0 expression and can use L'Hôpital's rule
 
  • #3
Understand what? That you have to factor them? As Janhaa said, that's not true- there are other methods. Of course, you cannot just set x= 3 because that gives 0/0 which has no meaning.

That you can factor them? That's due to a fundamental algebra rule: a polynomial is 0 for x= a if and only if it has x- a as a factor.

Here, because setting x= 3 the numerator becomes [tex]3^2+ 2(3)- 15= 0[/tex] so we know that x- 3 is a factor. And since 3(a)= -15, requires that a= -5, we know that the other factor must be x- (-5)= x+ 5:
[tex]x^2+ 2x- 15= (x- 3)(x+ 5)[/tex].

At x= 3, the denominator becomes [tex]3^2- 5(3)+ 6= 0[/tex] so we know that x- 3 is a factor of this also. and since 3(a)= 6 requires that a= 2, we know the other factor must be x- 2:
[tex]x^2-5x+ 6= (x- 2)(x- 3)[/tex].

Then the fraction is [tex]\frac{x^2+ 2x- 15}{x^2- 5x+ 6}= \frac{(x- 3)(x+ 5)}{(x- 3)(x- 2)}[/tex]
Now, as long as x is NOT 3[/tex], we can cancel those terms to get [tex]\frac{x+ 5}{x- 2}[/tex] and setting x= 3 in that we have [tex]\frac{3+ 5}{3- 2}= 8[/tex] which tells us that [tex]\lim_{x\to 3}\frac{x^2+ 2x- 15}{x^2- 5x+ 6}= 8[/tex].

Notice I said "as long as x is NOT 3". We cannot divide by 0 so that reduction is NOT true for x= 3. AT x= 3, this function is not defined- it has no value. But there is a theorem (unfortunately, often overlooked in introductory courses) that says "if f(x)= g(x) in some neighborhood of a but NOT necessarily at x= a (what is called a "deleted neighborhood) then [tex]\lim_{x\to a}f(x)= \lim_{x\to a}g(x)[/tex]".
 
  • #4
Why not all trinomials (for example x^2+3x-15) can be written as (x+a)(x+b) ?
 
  • #5
They can all the written like that - it's called the fundamental theorem of algebra. Unfortunately though sometimes a and b have to be complex numbers to do it, such as
[tex] x^2 + 1 = (x+i)(x-i) [/tex]
 
  • #6
Again, a polynomial, p(x), has factor x- a if and only if p(a)= 0. To find factors for [itex]x^2+ 3x- 15[/itex] we need to solve [itex]x^2+ 3x- 15= 0[/itex], for example, by the quadratic formula:
[tex]x= \frac{-3\pm\sqrt{9- 4(-15)}}{2}= \frac{-3\pm\sqrt{9+ 60}}{2}= \frac{-3\pm\sqrt{69}}{2}[/tex]
The two solutions are
[tex]-\frac{3}{2}+ \frac{\sqrt{69}}{2}[/tex] and
[tex]-\frac{3}{2}- \frac{\sqrt{69}}{2}[/tex]

so that can be factored as
[tex]x^2+ 3x- 15= \left(x+ \frac{3}{2}- \frac{\sqrt{69}}{2}\right)\left(x+ \frac{3}{2}+ \frac{\sqrt{69}}{2}\right)[/tex]

Of course, when we talk about "factoring a polynomial", especially when we are trying to factor in order to solve a polynomial, we really mean "factoring with integer coefficients" which can only be done if the polynomial has rational roots: if a/b is a root then the polynomial has a factor of x- a/b= (bx- a)/b.
 
  • #7
HallsofIvy said:
Understand what? That you have to factor them? As Janhaa said, that's not true- there are other methods. Of course, you cannot just set x= 3 because that gives 0/0 which has no meaning.
I mean why you can't solve it directly but you have to factorize it since the original trinomial and its factorization are the same thing
 
  • #8
scientifico said:
Hello, why I can't directly find lim x->3 (x^2+2x-15)/(x^2-5x+6) but I have to factorize them ?
Is there any intuitive way to understand that ?

Ignore the limit for the moment, and ask yourself if there is a good way to simplify the quotient of two polynomials without factorizing them.
 
  • #9
pasmith said:
Ignore the limit for the moment, and ask yourself if there is a good way to simplify the quotient of two polynomials without factorizing them.
What you mean ?
 
  • #10
The question is "what do you mean?" You keep asking why you must factor the polynomials after others tell you that you don't have to.

But the question pasmith is asking is "Do you know how to simplify an algebraic fraction."
 

FAQ: Understanding Limit Factorization Intuitively

What is limit factorization?

Limit factorization is a mathematical technique used to simplify complex functions by finding a common factor and dividing it out. This allows for a more intuitive understanding of the function's behavior as the input approaches a certain value, known as the limit.

How does limit factorization help in understanding limits intuitively?

By using limit factorization, we can break down a complex function into simpler forms, making it easier to see how the function behaves as the input approaches a limit. This allows for a more intuitive understanding of the function's behavior and can make it easier to evaluate the limit.

Can limit factorization be applied to any function?

Limit factorization can be applied to most functions, as long as they can be factored. However, some functions may require more advanced techniques to find the limit, such as L'Hôpital's rule.

Is limit factorization the only way to understand limits intuitively?

No, there are other techniques and methods for understanding limits intuitively, such as graphing the function or using numerical approximations. However, limit factorization can be a helpful tool in some cases.

Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using limit factorization?

Limit factorization can only be used for functions that can be factored, so it may not be applicable to all functions. Additionally, it may not always provide the most accurate or precise results, as it involves simplifying the function. It is important to consider the context and purpose of finding the limit when deciding whether to use limit factorization.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
53
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
543
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
963
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top