Understanding Polarization: Solving a Problem with the Law of Malus

  • Thread starter muirontriton
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Polarization
In summary, the problem is that the angle after the light goes through the first two polarizers is still 30 degrees. So the final answer is .49.
  • #1
muirontriton
3
0
Hello,
I was wondering if any of you guys can tell me whether or not I did the following polarization problem correct.

Problem:
Polarized light passes through a sequence of two polarizers whose axis of polarization forms a 30 degree angle. The second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer. What fraction if the incident intensity emerges from the set of polarizers?

The answer is 1/2.

My attempt:
I used the Law of Malus:
S = S(i)*cos^2(θ)

So I did this:

cos^3(30) * cos^2(30) * S(i) = S

The cos^3(30) comes from the average of the first two polarizers. As for the second part, I am not sure. I assumed that the problem says the angle is still 30° after the light goes through the first two. In the end, I get .49, which is close to the answer. However, I feel strongly that what I did is completely wrong. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That cos^3 is what is messing you up.

You know that the first polarizer brings it down to a fraction of .75.

Now how can you bring it down another 2/3?

I honestly don't know myself - there are no even angles that when put into cos^2 equal 2/3. I could be horribly wrong, but are you sure the answer is 1/2?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The answer is still 1/2.

What does it mean by "the second polarizer has the same polarization as the incoming light before it hits the first polarizer?"
 
  • #4
http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap24/polarizers/Polarizer.htm

Look at this applet. Change it to the two polarizer setting. Rotate the first polarizer 30 degrees (so 60 or 120 degrees, doesn't matter which). As far as I can tell, this is the situation described. That's why I'm confused. It's not 1/2. Maybe I'm wrong.

To answer your question, I'm pretty confident that that means it is at the same angle as the incoming light.
 
  • #5
But this is with a beam of unpolarized light entering the polarizers. The light entering the polarizers is polarized. I used the applet and set the two polarizers to 30 degrees, and I got an intensity of 50%. That would make sense, but the light coming in is polarized, so wouldn't that lead a different approach?
 

FAQ: Understanding Polarization: Solving a Problem with the Law of Malus

What is polarization?

Polarization is a physical phenomenon where light waves vibrate in a specific direction as they travel. This can occur through various processes, such as reflection, refraction, or scattering.

How is polarization used in everyday life?

Polarization is used in many everyday objects, such as sunglasses, 3D glasses, and LCD screens. It is also used in communication technologies, such as antennas and fiber optic cables.

What is the difference between linear and circular polarization?

Linear polarization refers to light waves that vibrate in one specific direction, while circular polarization refers to light waves that rotate as they travel. Circular polarization is often used in 3D glasses and satellite communication.

Can polarization be changed or manipulated?

Yes, polarization can be changed or manipulated through various processes, such as using polarizing filters or passing light through certain materials. This allows for control over the direction and intensity of polarized light.

How is polarization related to the color of objects?

Polarization can affect the color of objects in certain situations. For example, polarized sunglasses can reduce glare and improve color contrast, making objects appear more vivid. In addition, some materials may exhibit different colors when viewed under polarized light due to their optical properties.

Similar threads

Back
Top