Understanding the Conservation of Probability and Operators in Quantum Mechanics

In summary, operators in programming are symbols or keywords used to perform specific actions on one or more operands. There are several types of operators, including arithmetic, assignment, comparison, logical, and bitwise operators. Arithmetic operators perform basic mathematical operations, assignment operators assign values to variables, comparison operators compare values, logical operators combine multiple conditions, and bitwise operators manipulate binary data. These operators follow the standard order of operations and can be changed using parentheses. Logical operators are used to combine multiple conditions in a program and are commonly used in conditional statements and loops.
  • #1
paradoxymoron
21
1
First, I have a question regarding the conservation of probability. The book shows (quite elegantly) that

$$ \frac {d}{dt} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |\Psi (x, t)|^2dx = \frac {i\hbar}{2m} \Big{(}\Psi ^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial \Psi ^*}{\partial x} \Big{)} \Big |_{-\infty}^{\infty}$$

And it goes on to say that the derivative is zero, on the grounds that ##\Psi## approaches zero as ##x## approaches infinity. What if the limits were finite? Would the probability density still be normalizable for all ##t##?

We also recently started going over operators of classical dynamical variables. After stating the simple operator for position, the textbook goes on to derive an expression for the rate of change of the average position, i.e

##
\begin{align}
\frac{d \ \overline{x}}{dt}&=\frac{d}{dt} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x|\Psi (x, t)|^2dx \\
&=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x\frac{\partial |\Psi |^2}{\partial t}dx
\end{align}
##

The rest of the derivation - which uses the above result, and then double use of integration by parts - is easy to follow.
However, I'm confused as to why, when taking the derivative under the equal sign, it doesn't affect the ##x## and use the product rule. Is ##x## not a function of time?

The book then "postulates" that the rate of change of the average position is the average velocity, without justification. How is that true?

One more question. How is it that any measurable quantity ##Q## can be written as a function of position and momentum ##p##, i.e ##Q=Q(x, p)##? Can this be proven?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
paradoxymoron said:
What if the limits were finite?

If the limits are finite, then your wave function is going to be identically zero at the boundaries (this occurs, e.g., for the infinite potential well).

paradoxymoron said:
Is x not a function of time?
No, ##x## is a coordinate and it does not depend on time. What depends on time is the wave function, which in turn depends on ##x## and ##t##. You can deduce the average position which does in general depend on time, but this is not the coordinate ##x##, but a statement of a property of the wave function.

paradoxymoron said:
The book then "postulates" that the rate of change of the average position is the average velocity, without justification. How is that true?
It is a definition here and a way of making sense of the term "velocity" at the quantum level.

In general, you should try to limit your questions to one question (or at least one concept) per thread. Posting several topics in one thread will only make your responses scattered among each other.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #3
Orodruin said:
It is a definition here and a way of making sense of the term "velocity" at the quantum level.
Is it not already guaranteed by the Ehrenfest theorem?
 
  • #4
The Ehrenfest theorem tells you that the expectation value should follow the classical equation of motion. It is unrelated to the interpretation of this to the "velocity".
 

FAQ: Understanding the Conservation of Probability and Operators in Quantum Mechanics

1. What are operators in programming?

Operators are symbols or keywords used in programming to perform specific actions on one or more operands. They are used to manipulate data and make comparisons to control the flow of a program.

2. What are the different types of operators?

There are several types of operators, including arithmetic, assignment, comparison, logical, and bitwise operators. Arithmetic operators perform mathematical operations, assignment operators assign values to variables, comparison operators compare values, logical operators combine multiple conditions, and bitwise operators manipulate binary data.

3. How do arithmetic operators work?

Arithmetic operators perform basic mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. They can also perform more complex operations like modulus (remainder) and exponentiation. These operators follow the standard order of operations, and parentheses can be used to change the order of evaluation.

4. What are assignment operators used for?

Assignment operators are used to assign values to variables. They can be used to initialize a variable with a value, or to update the value of a variable. Some common assignment operators include "=" (simple assignment), "+=" (add and assign), and "-=" (subtract and assign).

5. How are logical operators used in programming?

Logical operators are used to combine multiple conditions in a program. They include "&&" (logical AND), "||" (logical OR), and "!" (logical NOT). These operators are commonly used in conditional statements and loops to control the flow of a program based on certain conditions.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
843
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top