- #1
restfull
- 7
- 0
According to Wikipedia, the shells of the Paris Gun fired over 120 km landed "1,343 meters (4,406 ft) to the right of where it would have hit if there were no Coriolis effect"...
Is it then correct to say that it would have deviated by 134.3 metres over 12 km, and 13.43 metres over 1.2 km etc etc?
i.e. is it correct that the drift due to the coriolis effect can be scaled down in this way, or is it non linear with respect to distance
Is it then correct to say that it would have deviated by 134.3 metres over 12 km, and 13.43 metres over 1.2 km etc etc?
i.e. is it correct that the drift due to the coriolis effect can be scaled down in this way, or is it non linear with respect to distance