- #1
user1139
- 72
- 8
- Homework Statement
- This is a conceptual question.
- Relevant Equations
- As it is conceptual in nature, no equations will be used in the question.
When we want to determine the radioactivity of a nucleus, we usually determine the counts detected using say a Geiger counter. The count rate is then usually used as the disintegration rate i.e. the activity of the nucleus.
However, say now we wish to measure the activity of Radon 222 using alpha spectroscopy. Here is the part I don't understand:
If we use say RAD7, a detector with inbuilt alpha spectroscopy, we have to wait for activity equilibrium between the parent Radon nucleus and the daughter nuclei (those who decay via alpha particle emission) before an accurate Radon concentration (measured in ##\mathrm{Bq/m}^3##) can be calculated. Why do we have to wait for equilibrium? And if we do wait for equilibrium, then the Radon concentration will only involved counts obtained from Po-218 after around 10mins and only after 3h will counts from both Po-214 and Po-218 be involved. Why is it okay to calculate the Radon concentration this way even though different contributions occur at different times?
However, say now we wish to measure the activity of Radon 222 using alpha spectroscopy. Here is the part I don't understand:
If we use say RAD7, a detector with inbuilt alpha spectroscopy, we have to wait for activity equilibrium between the parent Radon nucleus and the daughter nuclei (those who decay via alpha particle emission) before an accurate Radon concentration (measured in ##\mathrm{Bq/m}^3##) can be calculated. Why do we have to wait for equilibrium? And if we do wait for equilibrium, then the Radon concentration will only involved counts obtained from Po-218 after around 10mins and only after 3h will counts from both Po-214 and Po-218 be involved. Why is it okay to calculate the Radon concentration this way even though different contributions occur at different times?
Last edited: