Understanding the given transformation - PDE

In summary, "Understanding the given transformation - PDE" explores the principles and methodologies for analyzing partial differential equations (PDEs) through various transformation techniques. It emphasizes the importance of transforming PDEs into simpler forms to facilitate their solutions, discusses different types of transformations such as linear and nonlinear, and highlights their applications in theoretical and practical contexts. The text also addresses challenges and strategies in the transformation process, aiming to enhance comprehension and problem-solving skills related to PDEs.
  • #1
chwala
Gold Member
2,753
388
TL;DR Summary
I am going through the notes on pde. I want to be certain that i am getting it right. From my understanding of determinants of 3 by 3 matrices ...my approach is indicated
My interest is on how they arrived at ##r^2 \sin θ##

My approach using the third line, is as follows

##\cos θ[r^2 \cos θ \sin θ \cos^2 ∅ + r^2 \sin θ \cos θ cos^2∅ ] + r\sin θ [r\sin^2 θ \cos^2∅ + r \sin^2 θ \sin^2 ∅]=##

##\cos θ[r^2 \cos θ \sin θ[\cos^2 ∅+ \sin^2 ∅]] + r\sin θ [r\sin^2 θ [cos^2 ∅+ \sin^2 ∅]]=r^2\cos^2θ\sin^2 θ + r^2\sin^2θ\sinθ=##

##r^2\sinθ(cos^2θ+\sin^2θ)=r^2\sin θ##


If correct then we could also use second row but with negative place value i.e ##-\sin θ\sin ∅ [ a-b] + r\cos θ sin ∅[c-d]...## to realize the same.

Cheers.


1716341578933.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is your question about how to evaluate a 3 x 3 determinant? If so, you can choose to go across any row or down any column. To go across the 2nd row, the determinant is ##(-a_{2, 1})## times its cofactor + ##(+a_{2, 2})## times its cofactor + ##(-a_{2, 3}##) times its cofactor. For each of these terms the cofactor is the 2 x 2 determinant that consists of the entries not in that row and not in that column.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #3
chwala said:
##\cos θ[r^2 \cos θ \sin θ \cos^2 ∅ + r^2 \sin θ \cos θ cos^2∅ ] + r\sin θ [r\sin^2 θ \cos^2∅ + r \sin^2 θ \sin^2 ∅]=##
The symbol ## \phi ## is called "phi" and is entered in ## \LaTeX ## as \phi (##\phi##). The Unicode character ∅ represents the empty set and should not be used as a substitute for ## \phi ##.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #4
My intention was to distinguish phi and theta. Noted though.
 
  • #5
chwala said:
My intention was to distinguish phi and theta. Noted though.
Maybe, but the way to do this is to use a symbol that represents phi to represent phi, not a symbol that represents the empty set. The fact that sometimes this symbol looks a bit like some representations of phi is irrelevant.

It's like writing the equation for the circumference of a circle as 2🥧r.
 
  • Haha
Likes chwala
  • #6
Also, due to a quirk of the ## \LaTeX ## implementation, the Unicode character ∅ is translated to the symbol \emptyset which renders as ## \emptyset ##: if you want a character that looks like ∅ you need to use \varnothing: ## \varnothing ##.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top