Understanding the Probability of Coincidences: A Mathematical Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter musicgold
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical understanding of coincidences, particularly regarding the probability of experiencing rare events. The author illustrates that there is a 52% chance of encountering at least one of 100 rare events over 20 years, which translates to a greater than 50% likelihood that one person out of 20 will have an extraordinary story in a year. Clarification is provided that this does not relate to confidence intervals but rather to the independence of years and individuals in probability calculations. The key takeaway is that the probability remains consistent whether considering time or people. This highlights the fascinating nature of coincidences in everyday life.
musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Hi,

I am reading a book that explains the mathematics behind coincidences experienced in our daily lives. In one example, the author derives that the chance that you will at least once experience one of a set of 100 rare events (each with a one-in-million chance of occurring on any day) in a period of 20 years is as high as 52%. I understand this part completely.

What stumps me is the author’s following comment: It means that for every 20 people you know, there is a greater than 50% chance that one of them will have an amazing story to tell during the course of a year.

My questions are:
1. Is the author using the 1 of 20 phrase, to indicate a 95% confidence interval (19 out of 20 times)?

2. How the author expects one of a group of 20 to experience a coincidence in a year’s time?

Thanks,

MG.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. No. This has nothing to do with "confidence intervals".

2. You say you understand the probability of such an experience for one person, in 20 years is 0.52. All the second part is saying is that since "years" are independent (you are no more likely to have such an experience in one year than another) and "people" are independent (one person is nor more likely to have such an experience that another person), it doesn't matter whether you distribute over "years" or "persons". The probability that at least one person out of 20 will have such an experience in a given years is the same as that a given person will have at least one such an experience over 20 years: 0.52 or "a greater than 50% chance".
 
HallsofIvy,

Thanks a lot. Great explanation !
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top