- #1
parton
- 83
- 1
Hi all,
I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.
There are left-handed Weyl fields
[tex] l, \overline{e}, \varphi [/tex]
in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
[tex] (2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2) [/tex]
Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
[tex] \mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.} [/tex]
but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.
I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
[tex] \mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.} [/tex]
Using [tex] \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} [/tex]
we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.
But if this is really right, [tex] \varphi^{i} [/tex] would be in the [tex] (\overline{2}, -1/2) [/tex] representation, which is equivalent to [tex] (2,-1/2) [/tex]
But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
[tex] (\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} [/tex] which would be in the representation
[tex] (2, +1/2) [/tex]
I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.
Thanks in advance :)
I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.
There are left-handed Weyl fields
[tex] l, \overline{e}, \varphi [/tex]
in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
[tex] (2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2) [/tex]
Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
[tex] \mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.} [/tex]
but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.
I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
[tex] \mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.} [/tex]
Using [tex] \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} [/tex]
we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.
But if this is really right, [tex] \varphi^{i} [/tex] would be in the [tex] (\overline{2}, -1/2) [/tex] representation, which is equivalent to [tex] (2,-1/2) [/tex]
But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
[tex] (\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} [/tex] which would be in the representation
[tex] (2, +1/2) [/tex]
I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.
Thanks in advance :)