Uniformly equivalent metrics on finite set

In summary, the proof shows that for a finite set X, every two metric functions d1 and d2 on X are uniformly equivalent if we can find constants A and B such that d1(x, y) <= A d2(x, y) and d2(x, y) <= B d1(x, y) for all x and y in X. This can be achieved by taking A = max{d1(x, y)/d2(x, y)} and B = max{d2(x, y)/d1(x, y)} for all x and y in X. It is important to note that in the definitions of S1 and S2, x and y must not be equal.
  • #1
radou
Homework Helper
3,149
8
Yet another proof I'd like to check.

Statement. Let X be a finite set. One has to show that every two metric functions d1, d2 on X are uniformly equivalent.

Proof. If X is finite, then X = {x1, ..., xn}. We have to find constants A and B such that for every x, y in X, we have d1(x, y) <= A d2(x, y) & d2(x, y) <= B d1(x, y). Let S1 = {d1(x, y) / d2(x, y) | x, y from X} and S2 = {d2(x, y) / d1(x, y) | x, y from X}. If we take A = max S1 and B = max S2, the proof is completed. (For example, take some x and y, then d1(x, y)/d2(x,y) <= K1, and so on, for every x and y in X ; if we take A = max{K1, K2, ...}, then d1(x, y)/d2(x,y) <= A holds, for all x, y. Analogous for the other condition we need.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just as a technical point, in your definitions of S1 and S2 you have to specify that x and y are not equal
 
  • #3
Office_Shredder said:
Just as a technical point, in your definitions of S1 and S2 you have to specify that x and y are not equal

Oh yes, of course - thanks!
 

FAQ: Uniformly equivalent metrics on finite set

What is a uniformly equivalent metric on a finite set?

A uniformly equivalent metric on a finite set is a type of mathematical function that measures distance between elements in a finite set. It is defined as a metric that produces the same topology as the original metric on the set, meaning that it preserves the same open and closed sets.

How is the uniform equivalence of metrics determined?

The uniform equivalence of metrics is determined by comparing the open and closed sets generated by the two metrics. If the open and closed sets are the same for both metrics, then they are uniformly equivalent.

What is the importance of uniformly equivalent metrics on finite sets?

Uniformly equivalent metrics are important in mathematics because they allow for a simpler way to analyze and compare different metrics on a finite set. This can lead to a better understanding of the structure and properties of the set.

Can uniformly equivalent metrics be applied to infinite sets?

No, uniformly equivalent metrics can only be applied to finite sets. This is because infinite sets have a different structure and require a different type of metric to measure distance between elements.

Are there any real-world applications of uniformly equivalent metrics on finite sets?

Yes, uniformly equivalent metrics have applications in fields such as computer science, data analysis, and network analysis. For example, they can be used to compare the performance of different algorithms on a finite set of data points.

Similar threads

Back
Top