Uniqueness for ode coming from parabolic pde

In summary: A(t)^2w^2 dt\leq -\int_0^t (\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau)w dt.Using the fact that a(s,w(s),w(s))\geq \alpha ¦w(s)¦_V-\beta ¦w(s)¦_H for constants \alpha, \beta>0 uniformly in t, we can rewrite the right-hand side as:w(t)^2/2-\int_0^t w(\tau)w'(\tau) d\tau-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t A(t)^2w^2 dt\leq -\
  • #1
cliowa
191
0
Hey all,
I was working a little on parabolic pde, and came across this (comes up in regularity theory). Consider a Hilbert triple [itex]V\subset H\subset V^*[/itex] (continuous embeddings) and a linear operator [itex]A(t)[/itex] from V to V*, where t ranges in some interval [0,T]. Now let [itex]w\in H^1(0,T;V^*)\cap L^2(0,T;V)[/itex] solve

[tex]w'=A(t)w-\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau, \quad w(0)=0 [/tex].

I want to show that this implies w=0. How could I do that?

I tried multiplying by w and integrating by parts, which results in

[tex] 1/2 (w,w) +\int_0^t a(s,w(s),w(s))ds= -\int_0^t (\int_0^s A(\tau)w(\tau d\tau,w(s))ds,[/tex]

where a(s,w(s),w(s)) is the induced quadratic form satisfying [itex] a(s,w(s),w(s))\geq \alpha ¦w(s)¦_V-\beta ¦w(s)¦_H[/itex] for constants >0, uniformly in t. How does this help me?

Best regards...cliowa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Dear cliowa,

Thank you for sharing your findings on parabolic PDEs. It is an interesting problem and I will try to provide some guidance on how to approach it.

Firstly, let's recap the given problem. We have a Hilbert triple V\subset H\subset V^* and a linear operator A(t) from V to V*, where t ranges in some interval [0,T]. We also have a function w\in H^1(0,T;V^*)\cap L^2(0,T;V) that solves the parabolic PDE:

w'=A(t)w-\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau, \quad w(0)=0 .

To show that w=0, we can use the fact that w satisfies the following equation:

w'=A(t)w-\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau.

We can rearrange this equation to get:

w'-A(t)w=-\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau.

Now, let's multiply both sides by w and integrate from 0 to t:

\int_0^t w'w dt-\int_0^t A(t)ww dt=-\int_0^t (\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau)w dt.

Using integration by parts on the first integral, we get:

w(t)^2/2-\int_0^t w(\tau)w'(\tau) d\tau-\int_0^t A(t)ww dt=-\int_0^t (\int_0^t A'(\tau)w(\tau) d\tau)w dt.

Now, let's focus on the second integral on the left-hand side. We can use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to get:

-\int_0^t A(t)ww dt\leq \frac{1}{2}(w(t)^2+w(t)^2)-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t A(t)^2w^2 dt.

Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:

w(t)^2/2-\int_0^t w(\tau)w'(\tau) d\tau-\frac{1}{2}\int
 

FAQ: Uniqueness for ode coming from parabolic pde

What is the definition of uniqueness for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs?

Uniqueness for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs refers to the property that there is only one solution to the ODE that satisfies the given boundary or initial conditions. In other words, there are no other solutions that can be derived from the same set of boundary or initial conditions.

Why is uniqueness important for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs?

Uniqueness is important because it ensures that the solution to the ODE is well-defined and there are no conflicting or multiple solutions. This is especially crucial in applications where the solution represents a physical phenomenon and needs to be accurate and reliable.

What are the conditions for uniqueness in ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs?

The conditions for uniqueness in ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs depend on the specific PDE and the given boundary or initial conditions. In general, the conditions include smoothness of the solution, boundedness of the coefficients, and uniqueness of the solutions to the associated PDEs.

Are there cases where uniqueness does not hold for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs?

Yes, there are cases where uniqueness does not hold for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs. This can occur when the coefficients of the PDE are not smooth enough or when the boundary or initial conditions do not satisfy certain criteria. In these cases, there may be multiple solutions or no solution at all.

How is uniqueness proven for ODEs coming from parabolic PDEs?

Uniqueness can be proven using various mathematical techniques, such as energy methods, maximum principles, and comparison principles. These techniques involve analyzing the properties of the PDE and using them to show that there can only be one solution that satisfies the given conditions.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
991
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top