- #36
- 22,183
- 3,324
WannabeNewton said:This is one of the better trolls we have had in a long time I must say.
Dunno, that guy from yesterday with his numerology was pretty good.
WannabeNewton said:This is one of the better trolls we have had in a long time I must say.
Yeah but he was too polite. What kind of troll is polite?micromass said:Dunno, that guy from yesterday with his numerology was pretty good.
WannabeNewton said:This [STRIKE]is[/STRIKE] was one of the better trolls we have had in a long time I must say.
It is an experimental result.
You can invent a framework where the third derivative of the position depends on position, velocities and accelerations, where you have to know all three to get full knowledge about the system. According to all measurements done so far, we do not live in such a universe-
It is sincerely very difficult to understand what you intended to ask in this thread, so I can try with the following.ngawang said:In Landau's Mechanics it states "If all co-ordinates and velocities are simultaneously specified, it is know from experience that the state of the system is completely determined and that its subsequent motion can, in principle, be calculated. Mathematically, this means that, if all the co-ordinates [itex]q[/itex] and velocities [itex]\dot{q}[/itex] are given at some instant, the accelerations [itex]\ddot{q}[/itex] at that instant are uniquely defined."
My question is why is this so. I understand that from knowing the co-ordinates of a mechancial system the future evolution of a system is not uniquely determined. But how does the additional knowledge of the velocities uniquely determine the acceleration of the system and hence its future mechanical state?