- #1
mtanti
- 172
- 0
I'm "aware" of current theories about the cyclic model but what's wrong with this hypothesis?
The universe starts crunching forming a big black hole
All the energy is sucked back into this big black hole
The big bang starts again with all the matter and energy as the previous big bang
Assuming this is possible, there would be no difference in each cycle and would not be getting longer and larger.
Feel free to destroy my argument (nicely)
The universe starts crunching forming a big black hole
All the energy is sucked back into this big black hole
The big bang starts again with all the matter and energy as the previous big bang
Assuming this is possible, there would be no difference in each cycle and would not be getting longer and larger.
Feel free to destroy my argument (nicely)