Unknown's question at Yahoo Answers regarding the perimeter of a rectangle

In summary: So, the smallest rectangle with a perimeter of at least $35\text{ cm}$ would have dimensions of $9\text{ cm}$ by $11\text{ cm}$.In summary, the dimensions of a rectangle with consecutive odd integers for its sides can be represented as $2n-1$ and $2n+1$, where $n$ is a natural number. The perimeter of such a rectangle is given by $8n$ and in order to have a perimeter of at least $35\text{ cm}$, the value of $n$ must be equal to or greater than $5$. Therefore, the smallest such rectangle with a perimeter of at least $35\text{ cm}$ has dimensions of $
  • #1
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
13,288
12
Here is the question:

The dimensions of a rectangle are consecutive odd integers.

Find the smallest such rectangle with a perimeter of at least 35 cm.

Can you explain please.
It includes inequalities I think..

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: unknown's question at Yahoo! Answers regarding the perimeter of a rectangle

Hello unknown,

Let's let one pair of parallel sides, the smaller pair have length $2n-1$ and the other pair, the larger pair, have length $2n+1$, where $n$ is a natural number. We know they are both odd, because $2n$ must be even, and so adding/subtracting $1$ from an even number results in an odd number. We know they are consecutive odd numbers because their difference is $2$:

\(\displaystyle (2n+1)-(2n-1)=2n+1-2n+1=2\)

So, let's draw a diagram of our rectangle:

View attachment 1352

We see the perimeter $P$, which is the sum of the lengths of the four sides is:

\(\displaystyle P=(2n+1)+(2n-1)+(2n+1)+(2n-1)=8n\)

We are told that this perimeter must be at least 35 (measures in cm), so we may write:

\(\displaystyle 8n\ge35\)

Dividing through by $8$, we find:

\(\displaystyle n\ge\frac{35}{8}=4+\frac{3}{8}\)

Since $n$ is a natural number (a positive integer), we may then conclude we must have:

\(\displaystyle n=5\)

And so the two larger sides have length:

\(\displaystyle 2(5)+1=11\)

And the smaller sides have length:

\(\displaystyle 2(5)-1=9\)

This gives us a perimeter of $40\text{ cm}$. If we take the next smallest pair of consecutive integers, namely $7$ and $9$, we find the perimeter would be $32\text{ cm}$.
 

Attachments

  • unknownrect.jpg
    unknownrect.jpg
    3.1 KB · Views: 64

FAQ: Unknown's question at Yahoo Answers regarding the perimeter of a rectangle

What is the formula for finding the perimeter of a rectangle?

The formula for finding the perimeter of a rectangle is 2(length + width). This means you multiply the sum of the length and width by 2 to get the total perimeter.

How do you find the perimeter of a rectangle if only one side length is given?

If only one side length is given, you can still find the perimeter by using the formula 2(length + width). Simply plug in the given side length for either the length or width, and then solve for the other unknown side.

Can the perimeter of a rectangle be negative?

No, the perimeter of a rectangle cannot be negative. The perimeter is a measure of the distance around the outside of a shape, and distance cannot be negative.

Is the perimeter of a rectangle the same as its area?

No, the perimeter and area of a rectangle are two different measurements. The perimeter is the distance around the outside of the rectangle, while the area is the measure of the space inside the rectangle.

How do you find the perimeter of a rectangle with decimals?

To find the perimeter of a rectangle with decimals, you can use the same formula of 2(length + width). Just make sure to keep track of the decimal places and include them in your final answer.

Back
Top