Unpacking Dilbert's Math: Is Mr. Adams Right?

  • Thread starter BSMSMSTMSPHD
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the use of percentages in the Dilbert comic, where the project was said to be 10% over budget but was actually only 9% over budget due to a budget cut. The question was raised whether the author, Mr. Adams, was aware of this error or if it was a deliberate choice for comedic effect. The conversation also touched on the use of percentages in math and the accessibility of math-based humor in comics.
  • #1
BSMSMSTMSPHD
131
0
Has anyone read their Sunday comics yet today? Here are the first three frames of Dilbert:

1. Boss: Your project came in 10% over budget.

2. Dilbert: Actually, it came in at exctly what I estimated.

3. Dilbert: You cut my budget by 10% because you wanted to feel like a leader.

These are not the same! For example, if the original budget had been $100, then it was cut to $90. Therefore, 10% over budget would be $99, not $100.

I post this only to ask - do you think Mr. Adams knows of this error, or is this just another example of innumeracy in the general community?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So, if Mr. Adams had said the project came in 9% over budget, how would that have made the comic funnier?
 
  • #3
Many years ago I corrected a colleague for a similar minor infraction. He jokingly responded, "Are you going to call me a lier for 1%?" I think we both laughed at what was actually a keen observation.

Yes, I think he realized his inaccuracy before I opened my mouth, but he was interested in conveying an idea, not producing a mathematically accurate solution to a problem.
 
  • #4
So, if Mr. Adams had said the project came in 9% over budget, how would that have made the comic funnier?

It wouldn't have, but that wasn't my question. I'm just curious if you think he knew about the error. I'm not into nitpicking, I just like to think about the ways in which people think about mathematics.

Q_Goest: I'm sure your colleague did know of his error since he made the 1% comment. Mr. Adams worked for a telephone company and is now a comic, so, again, I wonder if he knows.
 
  • #5
The only way you can find out if he knows is to ask him (by email or whatever).

BTW, the author of the Dilbert comic series is plenty smart - he's a member of Mensa. Consider the very likely possibility that he's making a deliberate error to pander to a lay audience that mostly doesn't understand the finer points of percentages and reciprocals and wouldn't get the joke if he'd been mathematically accurate.
 
  • #6
While I agree with most of your statement, membership in Mensa does not endure mathematical literacy. There are plenty of intelligent people who still make errors with simple computations.

I wonder why he used percentages in the first place. If the statements had been made with, say, $1000 instead of 10% then they would be correct.

I will always enjoy Dilbert, but when looking for mathematical humor I think I will stick with Foxtrot.
 
  • #7
BSMSMSTMSPHD said:
While I agree with most of your statement, membership in Mensa does not endure mathematical literacy. There are plenty of intelligent people who still make errors with simple computations.

Did you mean "ensure" instead of "endure"?

I doubt someone in the top 2% of the population would've trouble with a simple concept like this, even if their entire education was in the liberal arts. Maybe it was a genuine mistake (due to inattention) at the time, but I'm willing to bet he'll be able to see the error immediately if he had it pointed out to him.

I still think it's a matter of pandering rather than a genuine mistake. Seriously, no-one "normal" would've gotten the joke if he'd done it mathematically right.

I haven't seen anything especially erudite coming out of Foxtrot, I will concede their humor is slanted a bit more geekily though. Even then, some lay readers will be alienated by it - I have a Foxtrot clipping parodying the Linux/Windows situation pinned to my cubicle wall and very few people "get" it (I work in a hospital, not geek central). Dilbert is probably more accessible than Foxtrot, a lot of people have at least a passing familiarity with management dogma (obvious pun on Dogbert not intended).
 
  • #8
Yeah, they put the damn d right next to the s on the keyboard. Whoever thought of that should be abashed and chagrined.

I see what you're saying, and I agree that 1) he would understand the error immediately, 2) the strip would not have been better if it had been correct and 3) he may have known about the error in advance.

I also agree that Foxtrot will miss the general public. I admire the author for going outside the typical political satire, though. Here are some examples that I found online for the unfamiliar:

http://www.madcool.com/cgi-bin/if/imageFolio.cgi?action=view&link=FoxTrot&image=Math.jpg&img=&tt=

http://math.sfsu.edu/beck/images/foxtrot.600percen.increase.gif

http://math.sfsu.edu/beck/images/foxtrot.glass.half.full.gif

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?i...math+foxtrot&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=G

http://www.prolynx.com/walinchi/jokes/foxtrot.gif

http://www.abc-canada.org/math_literacy/media/home_fox_trot_comic.gif

http://www.sjsd.net/~ledwards/00AD8D10-00802E21.1/Foxtrot1_0001.jpg

http://www.math.wustl.edu/~victor/classes/puzzles/ft.gif

He also likes physics:

http://ceae.rutgers.edu/physics/foxtrot.jpeg

http://physics.umbc.edu/~worchesk/Physics121/foxtrot.jpg

These are the few examples I could find. There are many, many more.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FAQ: Unpacking Dilbert's Math: Is Mr. Adams Right?

What is the premise of "Unpacking Dilbert's Math: Is Mr. Adams Right?"

The article aims to analyze and dissect the mathematical claims made by Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert, in his comic strips. It discusses whether Adams' mathematical statements are accurate and if they can be applied in real-life situations.

How does the author approach the analysis of Dilbert's math?

The author uses a combination of mathematical equations, logic, and real-world examples to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of Dilbert's math. This allows for a comprehensive and evidence-based analysis of the mathematical claims in the comic strips.

Is the article solely focused on Dilbert's math?

No, the article also delves into broader topics such as the use of math in popular culture, the impact of math on society, and the importance of mathematical accuracy in media. However, Dilbert's math serves as the main case study throughout the article.

What are some of the key takeaways from the article?

The article highlights the prevalence of math in everyday life and how it can be misrepresented or misunderstood in popular culture. It also emphasizes the importance of accuracy and critical thinking when it comes to mathematical statements, even in comedic contexts.

How does this article contribute to the field of mathematics?

This article offers a unique perspective on the role of math in popular culture and the potential impact of inaccurate or oversimplified mathematical statements. It also highlights the need for more critical analysis and fact-checking when it comes to mathematical claims in media and society.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
7K
Back
Top