Unravelling the Mystery of Infinite Potential Solutions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quantum mechanics problem involving a potential with infinite boundaries and a finite well. Participants explore the implications of having three unknowns and four equations, including boundary conditions and normalization constraints. It is clarified that while three equations can determine the coefficients, they only do so up to a multiplicative constant, affecting the normalization of the wavefunction. The continuity of derivatives at certain points is debated, particularly at the boundaries of the potential. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that normalization is essential for determining the energy eigenvalues and the relationships between the coefficients.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Say I have a potential that is infinite from - infinity to 0, -V_0 from 0 to a, and 0 from a to infinity.

Then I have three unknowns, two for the plane wave solution in the finite well and one for the exponential outside the well.

But I also have four equations. Two wavefunction continuity boundary conditions and a wavefunction derivative continuity boundary conditions. I also have the normalization equation!

How is this possible? How can the solutions depend on which 3 of the four equations I select to use?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already used the normalizability constraint in eliminating the exp(+ax) solution outside the well. Otherwise you would have four equations in four unknowns.
 
But I never used the constraint that square integral over all space of the piecewise wavefunction must be 1.
 
You used that it should be finite and then arbitrarily threw away a free constant.
 
But if I use the 3 boundary conditions to determine the 3 remaining constants then I could get a wavefunction with no adjustable parameters left and with a square integral over all of space not equal to 1, right?
 
No. If you've done this problem, and I know you have, you should know that the remaining three constants are only determined up to a multiplicative constant. If you want to continue bickering about this just do it with four equations and four unknowns. The same thing will happen.
 
I do not want to bicker. I just want to understand the problem.

I found that it is not even possible to implement the continuity of the derivatives at a which makes some sense considering the shape of the functions. So I was wrong, there are only a total of three constraints left and all is well.

I am not sure why it makes sense that the derivatives would not be continuous since there are no delta functions at boundaries, though?
 
Last edited:
The derivative at zero is not continuous because there is an infinite potential at x=0. That's worse than a delta function.
 
Of course. I am talking about the derivatives at a.
 
  • #10
The derivatives at a are continuous.
 
  • #11
So, maybe I did something wrong. I still do not understand what you were saying about the "the remaining three constants are only determined up to a multiplicative constant".

We have three equations and three unknowns, we should be able to uniqually determine each of the unknowns if there is a solution.
 
  • #12
The point is that your four equations will determine the three coefficients AND the set of allowed energy eigenvalues.
 
  • #13
Yes. I agree with that.
 
  • #14
So, that's the solution. If you don't use normalization, then you don't determine the values of all three coefficients, but only their ratios; the 3rd equation then determines the allowed eigenvalues.
 
  • #15
Thanks. I see.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K