Unveiling the Origins of SPDF: Insights from Old Threads and Blog Posts

  • I
  • Thread starter idea2000
  • Start date
In summary: Atomic_spectroscopyIn summary, the letters s, p, d, and f were assigned to the principal, angular momentum, magnetic, and spin quantum numbers respectively based on the spectral lines observed in elements. These letters do not have a mathematical derivation, but rather a physical explanation through quantum mechanics. The predictions from the Bohr model were not completely accurate, leading to the addition of new quantum numbers, including the exclusion principle, to explain the observations.
  • #1
idea2000
99
2
Are there any old threads or insights blog posts that talk about how spdf was derived? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Another reference:

https://chemistry.stackexchange.com...als-spdf-why-they-named-like-that/96351#96351

I found a poster reference where from memory he/she said:

- sharp
- pronounced
- diffuse
- foggy

which seems more to form but it disagrees with the literature.

As an aside, this reminds me of the River Runs Through It author, Norman McLean who described a small creek name "Wet A**" Creek which was later Indianified to Wetase Creek.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/idaho/1348265-selway-bitterroot-2.html
 
  • #4
Your posts were very helpful, thanks. Are there any resources that show how they were derived from schrodinger's? Like, actual math? Thanks!
 
  • #5
idea2000 said:
Your posts were very helpful, thanks. Are there any resources that show how they were derived from schrodinger's? Like, actual math? Thanks!
You will fin the derivation in any book dealing with atomic physics, and most textbooks on quantum mechanics.

For online resources, you can look at Hyperphysics: a first part describes the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom, and then, after separation of variables, how the ##l## quantum number comes about.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
  • #6
idea2000 said:
Your posts were very helpful, thanks. Are there any resources that show how they were derived from schrodinger's? Like, actual math? Thanks!

They aren't derived from math but from spectral line observation of elements and the results were then explained by quantum mechanics. The predictions of the Bohr model were wrong for some elements and other physicists adjusted the model by adding additional quantum numbers to bring it back into alignment with observation. Pauli's exclusion principle was the final one that allowed the new Bohr model to explain the lines.

You can read more here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff

FAQ: Unveiling the Origins of SPDF: Insights from Old Threads and Blog Posts

What is the SPDF and why is it important?

The SPDF stands for Sun, Planets, and Deep-Space Forum and it is an online platform where scientists and researchers discuss and share information about the origins of our solar system. It is important because it allows for collaboration and the exchange of ideas, leading to a better understanding of how our solar system formed.

What insights can be gained from old threads and blog posts on the SPDF?

Old threads and blog posts on the SPDF can provide valuable insights into past discussions and theories about the origins of our solar system. They can also reveal patterns and trends in scientific thinking and help to identify areas that need further research and exploration.

How do old threads and blog posts on the SPDF contribute to our understanding of the origins of SPDF?

By analyzing and synthesizing the information and discussions in old threads and blog posts, scientists can gain a deeper understanding of the origins of our solar system. They can also use this information to build upon previous research and theories, leading to new insights and discoveries.

What are the limitations of using old threads and blog posts as a source of information for studying the origins of SPDF?

One limitation is that old threads and blog posts may not always be accurate or reliable sources of information. They may also lack the most up-to-date research and findings. Additionally, the discussions and ideas presented in these posts may not have been thoroughly tested or peer-reviewed.

How can scientists ensure the validity and credibility of information obtained from old threads and blog posts on the SPDF?

To ensure validity and credibility, scientists can cross-reference information from multiple sources and verify the accuracy of data and claims. They can also evaluate the expertise and credentials of the individuals participating in the discussions and consider any potential biases or conflicts of interest.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top