Upper Bound Theorem: Verifying Inequality & Non-Planarity

In summary, the converse of the Upper Bound Theorem states that a graph is planar if it satisfies the inequality e ≤ { \frac{n (v-2)}{n-2}. However, this is not always true, as shown in the given picture. To verify this, the inside-outside algorithm can be used to prove that the graph is non-planar. The meaning of n in the theorem is not clearly defined, but it could possibly refer to the smallest cycle in the graph. This information should be stated in the materials from which the question was obtained.
  • #1
Natasha1
493
9
The converse of the Upper Bound Theorem would state that a graph which satisfies the inequality

[tex]e \leq { \frac{n (v-2)}{n-2} [/tex] is planar.

This converse is not true as seen in picture.

Verify that the inequality [tex]e \leq { \frac{n (v-2)}{n-2} [/tex] is true for this graph.

Using the inside-outside algorithm to show that the graph is actually non-planar.
 

Attachments

  • Pic 2.jpg
    Pic 2.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 379
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Does anyone know what the n stands for?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
e = edges
v = vertices

but what is n?
 
  • #4
There is more than one "upper bound theorem" and more than one "inside-out algorithm." Why don't you start by stating them here? This will help you as well as me. Your book should tell you what n is in the theorem statement.
 
  • #5
Even using google doesn't help me to understand what n is?
 
  • #6
Yes, so look in your book.
 
  • #7
Not in my book
 
  • #8
It will be explained wherever you got the question from.
 
  • #9
I'll take a guess- perhaps n is the smallest cycle. This would correspond to the face with the smallest number of edges in a planar graph*, so you would have n<=2e/f. Apply Euler's to get rid of f (this is assuming planar) and fiddle around and you can get the inequality you've posted.

But yea, this should be in your book, notes, or wherever this problem is from, so find it in your materials as my guess may not be what they are after (though it does look like it).*edit- this isn't quite right, but the minimal cycle length is <= the smallest number of edges on a face and the rest is the same.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Upper Bound Theorem: Verifying Inequality & Non-Planarity

1. What is the Upper Bound Theorem?

The Upper Bound Theorem is a mathematical theorem that states the maximum number of edges that a planar graph can have based on the number of vertices it contains. It is used to determine the non-planarity of a graph, which means that the graph cannot be drawn on a plane without any of its edges crossing.

2. How is the Upper Bound Theorem used to verify inequality?

The Upper Bound Theorem can be used to verify inequality by comparing the number of edges in a graph to the maximum number of edges allowed for a planar graph with the same number of vertices. If the number of edges in the graph is greater than the maximum allowed, then the graph is non-planar.

3. What is the process for verifying non-planarity using the Upper Bound Theorem?

The process for verifying non-planarity using the Upper Bound Theorem involves finding the maximum number of edges that a planar graph with the same number of vertices would have, and then comparing it to the actual number of edges in the graph. If the actual number is greater than the maximum, then the graph is non-planar.

4. Are there any limitations to the Upper Bound Theorem?

Yes, there are limitations to the Upper Bound Theorem. It only applies to simple graphs, which are graphs with no loops or multiple edges between the same pair of vertices. It also does not take into account the specific arrangement of edges in a graph, so it may not be able to determine non-planarity in some cases.

5. Can the Upper Bound Theorem be applied to all types of graphs?

No, the Upper Bound Theorem can only be applied to simple graphs. It cannot be used for directed graphs, multigraphs, or graphs with loops. Additionally, it is most accurate for graphs with a large number of vertices and edges, and may not be as effective for smaller graphs.

Similar threads

Back
Top