- #1
Evangeline101 said:Homework Statement
View attachment 101055Homework Equations
View attachment 101057
View attachment 101061
The Attempt at a Solution
View attachment 101062
View attachment 101063
[/B]
Back again :) Is this correct?
Thanks.
Ray Vickson said:In thread after thread you ask "is this correct?...". That is a bad habit: as a matter of standard operating procedure you should check your answers for yourself (as you would need to do in an exam setting). Then, if you find something does not "work", you will know you have made an error somewhere, and asking for help then makes sense.
Ray Vickson said:In thread after thread you ask "is this correct?...". That is a bad habit: as a matter of standard operating procedure you should check your answers for yourself (as you would need to do in an exam setting). Then, if you find something does not "work", you will know you have made an error somewhere, and asking for help then makes sense.
Evangeline101 said:I understand, but can you suggest a less time consuming method than graphing, if I am doing an exam I won't have time to graph anything to check my answer. For this specific question, is there a way I can put the points back into the equation to verify, well maybe in this case I would have to graph since they are points of intersection.
Also I should be more clear when asking my question ( I will make sure to do that in future questions), in this case I would like to know if my process for part b is correct, does it make sense to use the linear equation to solve for y-values, and if so, is it because the linear equation is set equal to y?
Sure. You can substitute the points you found into each equation. If the point is on the graph, the equation should be a true statement.Evangeline101 said:I understand, but can you suggest a less time consuming method than graphing, if I am doing an exam I won't have time to graph anything to check my answer.
Evangeline101 said:For this specific question, is there a way I can put the points back into the equation to verify, well maybe in this case I would have to graph since they are points of intersection.
Also I should be more clear when asking my question ( I will make sure to do that in future questions), in this case I would like to know if my process for part b is correct, does it make sense to use the linear equation to solve for y-values, and if so, is it because the linear equation is set equal to y?
A discriminant is a mathematical term used to determine the nature of the roots of a quadratic equation. It is found by taking the square root of the expression b^2-4ac, where a, b, and c represent the coefficients of a quadratic function in the form ax^2 + bx + c.
The discriminant is not used in linear functions because it is only applicable to quadratic equations. Linear functions have a degree of 1, meaning they can be written in the form y = mx + b, and do not have a quadratic term.
The discriminant can tell us whether the quadratic equation has two real, two imaginary, or two equal roots. If the discriminant is positive, the equation will have two real roots. If it is negative, the equation will have two imaginary roots. And if the discriminant is equal to 0, the equation will have two equal roots.
The discriminant can help us determine the number of solutions a quadratic equation has, and also the nature of those solutions. If the discriminant is positive, we can use the quadratic formula to find the two real roots. If it is negative, we know the equation has two imaginary roots. And if the discriminant is equal to 0, we can use the discriminant itself to find the two equal roots.
The discriminant is only applicable to quadratic equations, so it cannot be used in other types of functions such as cubic or exponential functions. However, there are other methods and techniques that can be used to analyze the roots and solutions of these types of functions.